Evyl Storage Inc (Evyl)

 

PROBLEM
Jamal owns shares in his brother’s corporation, Evyl Storage Inc (Evyl). Evyl is a small, privately-held corporation. There are only 12 shareholders. Evyl provides self-storage units for people’s stuff.
Recently, Evyl’s Board of Directors has developed a new business plan for Evyl. The Board proposes to sell almost all of the properties it uses for offering self-storage units and then to use the money to develop a new business in truck rentals.
At the most recent shareholders’ meeting, Evyl’s Board of Directors presented its plan to the shareholders for approval. Jamal thinks that this is a terrible idea and he voted against the plan. Unfortunately, ten of the twelve shareholders approved this plan to change the business of Evyl.
Jamal does not want to be in the truck rental business. He thinks that this decision is a bad one for Evyl, and he would like to get rid of his shares before they plummet in value. But it is not easy to sell the shares of a privately held corporation.

1. Does Jamal have any remedy in this situation? Explain your answer, taking care to explain the law and then apply the law to the facts. Remember to “connect the dots”.
In particular, first, identify the remedy that Jamal may have and clearly state the law related to this remedy (what is the remedy/what does it “give” and what are the conditions/requirements for being eligible for the remedy).

2. Second, apply the law to these facts. Show whether Jamal would be eligible and why or why not. What will Jamal “get” if he is eligible?

3. Third, draw a conclusion: a simple statement that summarizes your analysis.

 

Sample Solution

Choice of setting for the structured interview was in a controlled environment. Researcher and chosen participant were present only. Each researcher asked one participant that was known to them. There were no exclusion criteria present.
With the purpose of writing up transcript word for word, considerations to ethics was evident in the recording of the interview process, as permission was asked for and given prior.
The researchers ensured participants were fully aware of the purpose of the research and understood their rights. It was designed for these to be read out at the start of the interviews, explaining that participation is voluntary and that they are free to refuse to answer any questions and may withdraw from the interview at any time. Likewise, deletion of the interview recordings after the data was analysed was made known for their protection.
Results
Q1. Do you have family or outside responsibilities?
It was found that the 2 participants have different family lives. Participant 1 has no children and participant 2 has three.
Q2. How long have you been out of education and why is now your chosen time to return or thinking of returning?
Different amount of time separates each of the participants in how long each has been away from education. Participant 1 has been out for 5 years and participant 2 has been in and out of education during the last year.
Q3. Have you looked in depth at your chosen area of study and do you feel you are able to manage the workload and time management that is needed?
Knowledge was known to participant 2 who has studied previous in the chosen area of study and is aware of the workload it requires. However unaware of the course details, participant 1 has concerns over the workload. Time management is highly apparent to be a concern as participant 2 has family commitments and participant 1 has an active social life which will create difficulties for studying.
Q4. Are you able to financially support yourself and if so, by what means? Also, did the cost of your chosen course hinder your decision in anyway?

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.