Expository Text: “Desiree’s Baby” by Kate Chopin

 

 

Essay Questions:
1. What are Lahiri and Chopin’s ultimate messages about communication in marriage? What are their ideas regarding talking about difficult issues, such as the death of one’s child or a spouse’s racial discrimination? In addition, how do surrounding circumstances make communication particularly difficult in marriage?

2. How do Shoba and Shukumar communicate with one another? Why do they avoid talking about some of their most important issues? What is an example of this behavior? How does that affect their marriage?

3. How does Armand communicate his feelings about their marriage to Desiree? How does Desiree defend herself against Armand’s accusations? How would you characterize their communication style?

4. How do Shoba and Shukumar talk about the death of their loved ones? Why is grieving so difficult for this couple? What are some clues Lahiri provides as to why that’s the case? How does this issue affect their marriage?

5. What is the significance of the letter Armand’s mother had written to his father, particularly as it relates to marriage and communication? What information does the letter reveal about Armand’s identity? What is likely the motive behind his mother keeping this information hidden? How did her action have an impact on Armand? Did it hurt or benefit him in the end?

6. What is the significance of the truth-telling game Shoba and Shukumar play? What information do they discover about each other? How do they use this information against each other? How does this affect their marriage?

7. What do Chopin and Lahiri’s stories teach the reader about life, communication, and marriage? How do their characters reverberate those themes? What are some examples?

 

Sample Solution

Lahiri and Chopin both express similar messages in their stories about the importance of communication in marriage. In “The Interpreter of Maladies”, Lahiri explores how a lack of open dialogue between spouses can lead to misunderstanding and further isolation. Her protagonist Mr. Kapasi struggles with his inability to articulate his feelings for Mrs. Das who is married and unable to reciprocate his emotions, thus reinforcing the idea that honest communication is essential in relationships (Lahiri 1998).

Similarly, Chopin reveals the importance of understanding one another through words when characters such as Louise Mallard in “The Story of an Hour” remain silent despite feeling deeply wronged or hurt by their spouse’s actions (Chopin 1894). Both authors emphasize how communication can foster understanding between partners while also allowing them to share difficult experiences together.

Both authors also depict topics such as death which are particularly challenging subjects for couples due to the pain it brings up. In particular Chopin portrays complicated issues like racism when Mrs. Mallard discovers her husband Richard has been guilty of racial discrimination against some co-workers (Chopin 1894). This reinforces the idea that hard conversations must be had even when they are uncomfortable; failing to do so allows pain from such situations to linger unresolved.

Surrounding circumstances often make communication in marriage difficult as well; Lahiri illustrates this point through Mr Das’s character who is constantly busy with work leaving little room for meaningful discussions between him and his wife whereas Chopin reveals how societal expectations like those placed on women during this time period forced them into silence instead of giving them space to voice their discontentment or grievances.

In conclusion, both stories demonstrate similar ideas regarding the necessity of truthful dialogue within marriages while also highlighting other factors that inhibit couples from communicating effectively with one another whether it be societal pressure or lack of time available meaningfully connect with each other.

 

“The uncommon exhaustiveness of Kautilyas’ work, its prominent inductiveness and viable character, its resolute rationale, lack of regard of extrinsic good or religious standard and its extensive variety of subjects and interests gave it a remarkable blend of features..”[1]

– D.R.Bhandarkar

In Indian history, the hundreds of years to come and that cruised by, are recorded numerous incredible people and amazing characters who molded time through their exceptional deeds and their perfection in each ability. However, among of them, Kautilya might be the just a single identity who has been regarded and acknowledged as a splendid individual by Indian researchers as well as western Scholars as well. Kautilya was incredible political logician and mastermind. We have been portrayed as an extraordinary educator, canny statesman, dedicated nationalist, profound mastermind, merciless head, ace strategist, benevolent parsimonious, perfect savant and genuine saint.[2] He is called all-rounder since he got dominance in every one of the parts of learning. He was knowledgeable in business, fighting, Politics, Economics and Vedas. He lived around the third century B.C. however, even today his thoughts and standards demonstrate importance and pertinence in the present day society. He is an authentic achievement really taking shape of India. Kautilya is the best individual with astuteness and information. He is respected pioneer in the field of Economics. The credit of foundation of Mauryan Empire goes to the prescience and learning of Kautilya. He was a key counselor and councilor of Chandragupta Maurya, the originator of Mauryan Empire. “This realm was not simply made out of various irrelevant locale united under single sceptra; it was a genuine unit dependent on normal government which wherever settled the lord’s position as well as people in general good.[3] Kautilya was boss modeler of his ascent to control so he is called kingmaker as well. A man brimming with vision; he was constantly arranged for the most noticeably bad. He had the guts to talk his heart out even before the rulers. He himself lived such a real existence, rejecting all enhancements, empathy towards poor people and insidiousness to trickery when required which demonstrates a portion of his great attributes of nature. Kautilya was an educator at the University of Takshashila which is situated close Peshawar in Pakistan. He was the primary man to imagine the principal Indian Empire by unification of the different little kingdoms in the Indian subcontinent.

His noticeable works are Nitishastra, Chanakya Niti and Arthashastra. Among these, Arthshastra was generally vital. He thought about financial movement as main impetus behind the working of any political activity. Kautilya was a genuine scholar who crossed over any barrier among information and vision. For Kautilya, great administration was preeminent.

LIFE SKETCH OF KAUTILYA –

Lamentably There isn’t certainity about the day and age of the Kautilya So, subtleties of his introduction to the world and life are not reliable and we need to depend on convention. The normal time of the Kautilya is from 350-283 B.C.E. There are not very many genuine chronicled realities about his introduction to the world and demise with the exception of that he caused Chandragupta to mount the honored position, to fortify his domain and to join the

Indian states for battling against Alexander of Macedonia around 327 B.C.E. Chandragupta Maurya built up the Mauryan Empire in the year 321 B.C.E. Kautilya was likely conceived around 350 B.C.E. This demonstrates Kautilya was junior contemporary of Aristotle (384-322 B.C.E.). There is no evidence that Kautilya was influenced by Aristotleâ€ÿs thought. A few students of history have “addressing about Kautilyaâ€ÿs presence”. His place of birth isn’t guaranteed. Some state that he got the name Chanakya on the grounds that he was conceived in China. The Buddhist notices his origination as Takshashila while Jaina sacred text notice his origin as Chanak in Gola area of South India. As per one adaptation, origin of Chanakya was Dravida so one of the Chanakyaâ€ÿs different names was Dramila. Some trusts his origin was Patliputra. Be that as it may, Kautilyaâ€ÿs origin will keep on residual a debate. Kautilya had two other two names – Chanaka and vishnugupta. As he was conceived in the town of chanaka, he was called chanakya , Dr. Ganapati Shastri is of the conclusion that he was conceived in the ‘ kutala’ gotra. Consequently he was named as Kautilya. His folks gave him the name of Vishnugupta at ‘namkaran’ ceremony.[4]

At the point when Kautilya was conceived, he had favored with the full arrangement of teeth, which demonstrated that youngster will move toward becoming lord or sovereign.

Rishi Chanak was a Kautilya’s dad who was found out Brahmin. He was an educator instructor so he knew the significance of training. He began showing his child Kautilya in his initial age.

In his initial age, Kautilya was knowledgeable in Vedas; however he remembered them totally at early age, At that old time, the Vedas were considered as the hardest sacred text to think about. He was likewise shown arithmetic, geology and science alongside religion. Ideal from his youth, Kautilyaâ€ÿs insight and smarts was noticeable and successful. His most loved subject was Politics. Kautilya had seen extremely troublesome conditions from his youth. His father,Chanak was savvy, better than average and self regarded Brahmin. He restricted bad form or everlasting deeds. The false and haughty lord Dhannanda disliked him normally. The ruler disparated the rightness of Chanak so he bugged Chanakâ€ÿs family for phony reasons. Chanak was placed in jail by the ruler. He kicked the bucket in jail. Nobody raised a voice against the unfairness with Chanak. Kautilya was an almost no kid that time. He was to a great degree miserable due to his fatherâ€ÿs passing and foul play occurred with his family. After his fatherâ€ÿs demise, his life was likewise in threat. So he left Patliputra by taking a promise that he would return and battle against shamefulness and deliver retribution against Dhannanda. Kautilya had his training at a popular college of Takshashila which was exceptionally rumored one around then.

Being a Brahmin of solid assurance anf solid will, he thought to render retribution from Nanda – King of Patliputra. He left the capital mortified and he went to scan for a warrior. On his way, he ran over the youthful Chandragupta. He found in the last a promising young fellow and began the battle for his establishment on the position of authority of Magadha. Their First endeavor Proved to be a disappointment. Anyway in the long run, Chandragupta regrouped his powers, overpowered the borderstates and propelled assault on the capital. The underhanded ruler Dhannanda best of Nanda administration wa gifted in 322BC. Accordingly another tradition Maurya was built up with Chandragupta Maurya enthroned as the lord of Magadha in 321 BC and ruled upto 298 BC.

The credit for this triumph goes to kautilya broadly acknowledged name whose conciliatory aptitude and all encompassing information of organization empowered Chandragupta, his understudy not exclusively to triumph against the Nandas yet additionally merge his empire.[5]

 

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.