Factors when supporting change by analyzing the feasibility of a new initiative

 

As a master’s-level health care practitioner, you are expected to consider a number of factors when supporting change by analyzing the feasibility of a new initiative or identifying an issue within your organization. For example, you must take into consideration the various types of risk (such as patient safety, physical plant, financial, or reputation), as well as the present and future value of the service line or economic opportunity you are invested in. Additionally, you must also balance your ethical and moral responsibility to provide quality care to patients and populations while protecting your organization’s assets and economic viability in the near and long terms.

 

Sample Solution

The Role of the Master’s-Level Healthcare Practitioner

As a master’s-level healthcare practitioner, my role in driving change is multifaceted. It involves a delicate balance between improving patient care, ensuring organizational sustainability, and adhering to ethical principles.

Key Considerations for Change Initiatives:

  1. Risk Assessment:
    • Patient safety: Prioritizing patient well-being is paramount. Any change must enhance or at least maintain safety standards.
    • Physical plant: Evaluating the infrastructure’s capacity to support the new initiative is crucial.
    • Financial risk: Assessing potential costs, revenue generation, and return on investment is essential.
    • Reputation risk: Considering how the change will impact the organization’s public image.
  2. Value Assessment:
    • Present value: Evaluating the immediate benefits of the initiative in terms of improved patient outcomes or operational efficiency.
    • Future value: Assessing the long-term impact on the organization’s strategic goals and market position.
  3. Ethical and Moral Considerations:
    • Patient-centered care: Ensuring that the change aligns with the principles of beneficence, non-maleficence, autonomy, and justice.
    • Organizational integrity: Upholding the organization’s values and mission.
    • Resource allocation: Making ethical decisions about the distribution of limited resources.
  4. Balancing Short-Term and Long-Term Goals:
    • Considering the immediate needs of patients and staff while also planning for the organization’s future.
    • Finding a balance between cost-cutting measures and investments in quality improvement.

Example: Implementing Telehealth Services

When considering the implementation of telehealth services, a master’s-level practitioner would assess:

  • Risk: Potential technical issues, privacy concerns, and reduced access for patients without technology.
  • Value: Improved patient access, reduced no-show rates, and potential cost savings.
  • Ethics: Ensuring equitable access, protecting patient confidentiality, and maintaining quality of care.
  • Short-term and long-term goals: Balancing the need for rapid implementation with the development of a sustainable telehealth program.

By carefully considering these factors, healthcare organizations can increase the likelihood of successful change initiatives while minimizing risks and maximizing benefits.

 

This question has been answered.

Get Answer