Compare and contrast the ideas of fate and crime in Oedipus, Tyrannus and Hamlet. How do the playwrights use the ideas of supernatural (of prophesy, of crime) in the world of their plays, What can their treatment of crime and the supernatural tell us about the culture the play emerges from? What, if anything, can it tell us about ourselves and our own world? About our ideas of right and wrong and of personal responsibility.
Oedipus Rex and Hamlet are prominent literary characters who constitute the example of brave men under challenging circumstances, they experience tragic events in their lives concerning their family members, which eventually leads to their fall. Oedipus is the man whose life is in the hands of fate, he murders his father and marries his mother, fulfilling the prophecy his parents were told when he was born. Hamlet is the Prince of Denmark whose deceased father asks to avenge him by killing Claudius, the new king and Hamlet`s uncle. Both of them try to learn about the real murderers of their fathers, yet their stories have different endings.
regards to the osmosis of pieces into lumps. Mill operator recognizes pieces and lumps of data, the differentiation being that a piece is comprised of various pieces of data. It is fascinating to take note of that while there is a limited ability to recall lumps of data, how much pieces in every one of those lumps can change broadly (Miller, 1956). Anyway it’s anything but a straightforward instance of having the memorable option huge pieces right away, somewhat that as each piece turns out to be more natural, it very well may be acclimatized into a lump, which is then recollected itself. Recoding is the interaction by which individual pieces are ‘recoded’ and allocated to lumps. Consequently the ends that can be drawn from Miller’s unique work is that, while there is an acknowledged breaking point to the quantity of pieces of data that can be put away in prompt (present moment) memory, how much data inside every one of those lumps can be very high, without unfavorably influencing the review of similar number