Option 1: Research Paper

Write a research paper analyzing and evaluating Federalism. The text of this research paper must be 7–8 pages (not including title page, reference page, and any appendices). This paper must be in current APA format with 1-inch margins, must be in 12-pt, Times New Roman font, and must include a title page and reference page. You must include citations to a sufficient number of appropriate sources to fully support your assertions and conclusions (which will likely require more than the minimum number of citations); the paper must contain citations to a minimum of 6 sources not including the course textbook, assigned readings, and the Bible.

Option 2: PowerPoint Presentation

Complete a PowerPoint presentation with audio (see tutorial in the course for adding audio) analyzing and evaluating Federalism. The presentation must include 9–10 minutes of student-spoken audio and incorporate at least 6 appropriate references in addition to the course textbook, assigned readings, and the Bible. Images may be incorporated where appropriate. A separate document listing all references in current APA format must be submitted with the PowerPoint.

General Instructions

You are expected to comport with the highest writing, research, and ethical standards. Additionally, to do well on this assignment, you must conduct high quality research and offer rich, well-supported analysis and evaluation. The emphasis here is on your ability to critically evaluate and analyze the material and to exhibit nuanced understanding of the substance, dynamics, and ramifications reflected in the subject matter; mere reporting, opinion, or conjecture will not suffice.

Sample Solution

‘Falsifiability’ is the measure of division between the common sciences and the pseudo-sciences. Karl Popper’s plan of misrepresentation is to determine the issue of division between the Natural Sciences and the Pseudo-Sciences. Right now, essence of the issue is to look at Popper’s measure of a logical request and its suggestion to Science, Epistemology, and the State.

0.3 Scope and Limits of Study

Critically, this exposition is constrained to the part of Philosophy of Science and it uncovered especially, Karl Popper’s hypothesis of adulteration as the standard of a logical request and along these lines gives an answer for the division issue between the Natural Sciences and the Pseudo Sciences. It covers likewise the issue of enlistment considered the authentic advancement of acceptance starting with Aristotle’s inductive technique by straightforward list; Francis Bacon’s enlistment by end; Hume’s investigation of acceptance; Kant’s view on causality; consistent positivists’ inductive strategy by check and afterward, Popper and the standard of acceptance.

0.4 Aims and Objectives

Thinking about the impossible to miss and basic nature of this paper, its essential point is to evaluate the philosophical undertaking of Karl Popper’s Doctrine of The Criterion of Demarcation through an unmistakable and particular knowledge of Popper’s Falsification. From the composition on Karl Popper’s Doctrine of Demarcation, it will be made unequivocal that Popper’s Criterion of Demarcation while offering us an edge work for another cognizance of exploratory headway has furthermore gotten amazing input explicitly corresponding to Thomas Kuhn’s on incommensurability; Imre Lakatos on the examination Programs; Duhem-Quine’s proposition of speculation; Paul Feyerabend on against strategy; Sokal and Bricmont on hypothesis and practice and other basic issues with Critical Rationality. The above scrutinizes of Popper however substantial yet not very requesting; they just recommend that Popper’s belief system be altered to some degree.

0.5 Methodology