FIBROCYSTIC

 

TOPIC: FIBROCYSTIC
Case report tells a story in a narrative format that includes the presenting concerns, clinical findings, diagnoses, interventions, outcomes (including adverse
events), and follow-up. You will choose a small parts pathological ultrasound case to present, you will follow the instructions of the attached rubric to put
your case study together. Your case study is due to me by email (power point)on 04/12/2023 you will present your case on this day as well. Your presentation
should not exceed 8mins, designated times will be assigned as we approach the due date.

 

 

 

Sample Solution

This report is about a female patient in her mid-forties who presented with complaints of chronic pain and tenderness in the upper right quadrant of her abdomen. Upon further physical examination, it was determined that she had Fibrocystic Breast Disease (FBD), which is characterized by fibrosis and cysts in the mammary gland tissue. To treat this condition, the patient was prescribed oral contraceptives as well as various vitamins and supplements to reduce symptoms; however, there were no significant improvements noted after two months. Follow up imaging revealed new cyst formation for which an ultrasound guided aspiration was performed to remove fluid from these areas. The results showed decreased inflammatory markers overall but unfortunately some adverse effects such as increased inflammation due to needle insertion did occur during surgery. Overall though, the patient’s health improved significantly following intervention and follow-up care has been scheduled every three months going forward.

regards to the osmosis of pieces into lumps. Mill operator recognizes pieces and lumps of data, the differentiation being that a piece is comprised of various pieces of data. It is fascinating regards to the osmosis of pieces into lumps. Mill operator recognizes pieces and lumps of data, the differentiation being that a piece is comprised of various pieces of data. It is fascinating to take note of that while there is a limited ability to recall lumps of data, how much pieces in every one of those lumps can change broadly (Miller, 1956). Anyway it’s anything but a straightforward instance of having the memorable option huge pieces right away, somewhat that as each piece turns out to be more natural, it very well may be acclimatized into a lump, which is then recollected itself. Recoding is the interaction by which individual pieces are ‘recoded’ and allocated to lumps. Consequently the ends that can be drawn from Miller’s unique work is that, while there is an acknowledged breaking point to the quantity of pi

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.