Fiction Literary Analysis

 

 

 

A literary analysis is an essay about works of literature. You will be analyzing different components of texts and discussing how they work together to inform
a thesis of your choice. For further information on literary analyses, view the presentation on Purdue
Owlhttps://owl.purdue.edu/owl/teacher_and_tutor_resources/teaching_resources/writing_a_literary_analysis_presentation.html. You can also find valuable
information about a “Literature Essay“ from your text pp. 1918-1936. You may discuss any of the fictional works we have read so far this semester. List of
texts:
“Cathedral” p. 28
“A Conversation with My Father” p. 50
“Gooseberries” p. 55
“The Lives of the Dead” p. 63
“King of the Bingo Game” p. 83
“Sonny’s Blues” p. 91
“Where Are You Going, Where Have You Been?” p. 114
“A & P” p. 163
“The Cask of Amontillado” p. 173
“The Mark on the Wall” p. 186
Choose a text and find a theme for that text. There are likely many themes to each text. Your job is to establish a theme of your choosing and support that
choice with evidence from within the text. This essay requires a strong thesis and evidence from the text to support your thesis. You will need to use
quotations, paraphrases, in-text citations, and a works cited page. You may use outside, scholarly sources to also support your claim—although not required.
If you choose to use scholarly sources, limit your research to 2 sources. Databases from the library website are good resources.
To emphasize the importance of the thesis, put your thesis in bold face so that way YOU are recognizing what it is you are arguing.

Sample Solution

orn a blank canvas and their lives are determined by varying experiences, positive interactions whilst acquiring different attributes and not due to DNA. She believed men and women were born equal and brains were malleable by culture, life experiences and desires, whereas Freud (1961) argued this and believed men and women’s brains were very different and the way they were formed was wholly down to DNA. Freud (1961) founded the study of psychoanalysis, he believed traumas and unresolved issues during childhood could be coaxed out by sensitive talk therapy. This can be seen in settings today by way of one:one counselling or through emotional literacy. Place2Be (1994) delivers school based therapeutic interventions. A large study was carried out on 47,000 children in primary schools, based on the findings of Place2Be, children’s social and emotional wellbeing had improved as perceived by their family members and teachers following interventions (White Et al., 2009). Supporting this Fox and Butler (2007) carried out a small-scale study on 219 pupils, attempting to discover whether counselling is successful in schools. The results suggested that the treatment delivered to the children, had less distress and fewer problems were observed. However, they recommended further research is required, to discover when and to who it was more of a success to. The evidence suggests that pupils receiving psychological therapies were a success however, The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE, 2010) expressed the opinion and recommended several forms of therapy as first-line interventions, not talk therapy or counselling in isolation. Another essential point regarding one:one counselling and emotional literacy is the relationship a child has with the facilitator. Mindmatters (n.d.) advocates how vital it is for children to have a trusting and caring relationship with the individual, as a result of this trust and understanding, will promote open communication. Similarly, Bowlby (1969) suggested that children come into this world with an innate response of survival; form attachments to survive. Consequently, if secure attachments are not formed this would lead to distress and negative experiences concluding that a trusting relationship is not formed between the pupil and the facilitator. Belsky and Fearon (2002) support Bowlby and state ‘poor attachment outcomes are associated with long-term adverse consequences in cognitive, adaptive, and behavioral domains’. Comparing Maslow (1968c), Bronfenbrenner (1979) Sameroff (2010) and Shonokoff an

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.