Film Analysis

at
Categories
Tags

 

 

 

 

This week, you will analyze a three- to five-minute segment of a movie or a television episode depicting aggression, conflict, and peacemaking.

After watching the movie segment, create a report on your analysis. In your report:

Mention the name of the movie.
Describe the setting and overall storyline of the movie.
Describe the main characters in the observed movie section.
Describe the situation that you analyzed and interpret the action of the characters depicting aggression, conflict, and peacemaking.
Draw conclusions based on social psychological concepts and theories.

 

Sample Solution

When writing a film analysis, you must evaluate the film’s composition—the different components and decisions that come together to form the final product. In establishing an argument, cinema analysis goes beyond analyzing the film as literature and includes camera angles, lighting, set design, sound aspects, costume choices, editing, and so on. The first step in film analysis is to watch it with a purpose. I’m watching the movie. First and foremost, you must watch the film with a critical eye. Consider why you were given the task of seeing a movie and writing an analysis. What role does this activity play in the class? What made you choose this particular film?

model particularly regarding leader-member relations, if the group are familiar and trusting of the leader policy implementation becomes much simpler. Similarly to leadership, understanding and adapting to the situation is key to a leader being able to implement policies that ensure a group work as a team. Teamwork is a product of good leadership, and is again the responsibility of the leader to ensure the group are working successfully together. Highly functioning teams are essential within organisations to increase productivity and member satisfaction, by utilising the talents of all group members effectively within the constraints of the task, personal relationships and the group goals (Pettinger, 2007).
Figure 2: Tuckman’s Model of Group Development (Agile Scrum Guide, 2019)
Tuckman in his Model of Group Development provides easily identifiable stages that a groups performance can be measured against, making it useful for monitoring performance, Figure 2 shows Tuckman’s model. Ranking group performance against this scale can provide leaders with a clear understanding of how the group are functioning, allowing them to implement policies to change this if performance is unsatisfactory (Pettinger, 2007). Within organisations, the theory can be loosely applied to creating teams by grouping familiar individuals with the aim that they will reach the norming and performing stage of the model quicker. For short and simple tasks this is an extremely effective way of organising groups, due to the increased short term productivity. However there are significant issues with grouping individuals in this manner, particularly when tasks become more complex, and ultimately the model should mainly be used for monitoring the progress of groups (Pettinger, 2007).
Figure 3: Belbin’s Team Roles (PrePearl Training Development, 2019)
A more functional approach of grouping individuals is to utilise Belbin’s Team Theory (Belbin, 2017). Belbin identifies 9 key roles that must be fulfilled within a group to ensure success, the roles are summarised in Figure 3. The roles cover a wide spectrum of skills that need to be present within a group to ensure success, and becomes essential when tasks are lengthy and complex. Organisations can find the Belbin roles each individual fits through a questionnaire, and thus balanced groups can be formed covering all the

This question has been answered.

Get Answer