Finite hypothesis

 

 

 

https://tinyurl.com/AML-2021-ASSIGNMENT1
1. (0.5 points) Give an example of a finite hypothesis class H with VCdim(H) = 2021.
Justify your choice.
2. (0.5 points) Consider Hballs to be the set of all balls in R2
:
Hballs = {B(x,r), x ∈ ℝ2
, r ≥ 0 }, where B(x,r) = {y ∈ ℝ2
| || y – x ||2 ≤ r}
As mentioned in the lecture, we can also view Hballs as the set of indicator functions of
the balls B(x,r) in the plane: Hballs ={ ℎ!.!: ℝ! → 0,1 , ℎ!.! = �!(!,!), � ∈ ℝ!, � > 0}.
Can you give an example of a set A in R2 of size 4 that is shattered by Hballs? Give
such an example or justify why you cannot find a set A of size 4 shattered by Hballs.
3. (1 point) Let X = R2 and consider Hα the set of concepts defined by the area inside a
right triangle ABC with the two catheti AB and AC parallel to the axes (Ox and Oy)
and with AB/AC = α (fixed constant > 0). Consider the realizability assumption. Show
that the class Hα can be (�, �) − PAC learned by giving an algorithm A and
determining an upper bound on the sample complexity mH( �, �) such that the
definition of PAC-learnability is satisfied.
4. (1 point) Consider H to be the class of all centered in origin sphere classifiers in the
3D space. A centered in origin sphere classifier in the 3D space is a classifier hr that
assigns the value 1 to a point if and only if it is inside the sphere with radius r > 0 and
center given by the origin O(0,0,0). Consider the realizability assumption.
a. show that the class H can be (�, �) − PAC learned by giving an algorithm A and
determining an upper bound on the sample complexity mH(�, �) such that the
definition of PAC-learnability is satisfied. (0.5 points)
b. compute VCdim(H). (0.5 points)
5. (1 point) Let H = {ℎ!: ℝ → 0,1 , ℎ! � = � !,!!! ∪[!!!,!!) � , � ∈ ℝ}. Compute
VCdim(H).
6. (1 point) Let X be an instance space and consider H ⊆ {0,1}! a hypothesis space with
finite VC dimension. For each � ∈ X, we consider the function zx: H →{0,1} such
that zx(h) = h(x) for each ℎ ∈ H. Let Z = {zx: H →{0,1}, � ∈ X}. Prove that
VCdim(Z) < 2VCdim(H)+1.
Ex-officio: 0.5 points

Sample Solution

Earlier, in accordance with Rule 2(1)(k) of the Trade Mark Rules, 2002, ‘graphical representation’ simply meant representation in paper form. However, the latest Rule 2(1)(k) of the Trade Marks Rules, 2017 defines ‘graphical representation’ as representation of a trade mark for goods or services represented or capable of being represented in paper form and includes representation in digitised form. With the inclusion of representation in digitised form, the scope of the term ‘capable of being graphically represented’ has widened considerably. This amendment is a ray of hope for proprietors of non-conventional trade marks like odour marks or motion marks which are not capable of being graphically represented in the traditional sense.

The term ‘digitised form’ has a wide scope for interpretation and may be used by proprietors to their advantage. ‘Digitised form’ could be interpreted to mean a digital version of a graphical representation, say an illustration in a pen-paper format or it could even mean digital data like audio clips or mp3 recordings in case of sound marks. Allowing trade marks to be digitally recorded is a hugely progressive step for non-conventional trade marks and their registration.

Types of Non-Conventional Trade Marks

Sound Mark

Sound marks are a type of non-conventional trade mark wherein the distinctive sound or audio is an indication of the origin of the mark. Today a unique sound or combination of sounds or a signature sound, is one of the most powerful marketing tools. Catchy jingles are a brilliant way to ensure the consumer associates the product or brand with said jingle, i.e. sound mark. However, due to the use of the words ‘capable of being graphically represented’, sound marks are often not easy to get registered. Due to the inclusion of digital form in graphical representation, registration of sound marks is now relatively easier. Earlier, when graphical representation was limited to pen and paper format only, it was thought that an apparent solution would be to deposit a digital recording of the sound with the registrar. But this proposition was rejected by the International Trademark Association (INTA) as being impracticable, for firstly, sound cannot be published by the Trademark Registry and people would have to go to th

This question has been answered.

Get Answer