Forensic Psychology

You are doing a presentation at the Metropolitan Police Academy in a major city. Your presentation for the afternoon is on the definition of truth when dealing with cases in which the defendant has a psychopathological issue that may have contributed to his or her commission of a crime. Attending this lecture will be a mixture of law enforcement officers, forensic psychologists, and prosecutors from the State’s Attorney’s Office. You know that police, forensic psychologists, and prosecutors all believe in the truth but their definitions of truth may vary. To avoid conflict in the lesson, you prepare a handout in the form of a white paper of 3–5 pages. You explore the definition of truth from the perspectives of each of the class participants (police, forensic psychologists, and prosecutors). Include the following in your white paper: Explain the criteria that police investigators have in their finding of the truth as it relates to the investigative outcome of their respective cases. Define the criteria the forensic psychologists use to determine the truth that they concludes about the defendant(s) in their respective cases. Describe the method by which the prosecutors use in determining what they define as the truth in their respective cases.

Sample Answer

foreigners persuasively for a long time. Somewhere in the range of 1929 and 1936, Hoover ousted a huge number of Mexicans, which was known as the Mexican Repatriation. In spite of the fact that it was exceptionally questionable and there were better approaches to manage the circumstance, Hoover was effective in making more openings for work.

Hoover progressed in the direction of improving the economy. While he was president, the economy smashed and many individuals censured him for it. He was a safeguard of free enterprise, a financial framework where exchanges between private gatherings are liberated from government intercession. This incorporates things like guideline, benefits, taxes, and sponsorships. He was focused on a little government and upheld a free market so he didn't do a lot of when the market slammed. Hoover bolstered volunteerism inside the network and trusted it was the most ideal approach to understand the issue of destitution. He felt that deliberate joint effort among open and private associations would enable the economy to prevail since, in his view, government guideline and inclusion in business would just damage the economy.

Another explanation Hoover was a disagreeable president is that he was exceptionally supremacist. He was accused of being an undemocratic supremacist who considered blacks to be a types of "sub-men." It is accepted that Hoover is one of the figures that made the irritation for blacks in the Republican party. As president, he had an extremely southern approach and merged his southern triumph by cleansing blacks from authority positions in the southern wing of the gathering. Hoover bolstered racial domination and was committed to being a liberal democrat, in the same way as other of his time. On the issue of race, he didn't assist with making individuals tolerating, he just aggravated the issue of prejudice. He regarded minorities as though they weren't in the same class as whites and prevailing with regards to making bigotry a considerably progressively noticeable issue in America.

All in all, Hoover did numerous things to accomplish his objectives that were not extremely well known among the general population. He prevailing in a considerable lot of his objectives and helped the economy a bit, yet not for everybody. Minorities and the poor despite everything endured the unpleasant occasions. Hoover was bigot against minorities and was exceptionally undemocratic. Generally, he was not a president that had a huge effect on our nation and government, other than that he was one of the originators of prejudice in the