Foundation of your leadership approach.

 

You are a manager in a large company, and you are assigned to a mentor. Your mentor is very excited that you are taking this particular course and has therefore asked you to develop and share your own personal theory of leadership. Your mentor wants to make sure that your personal development is grounded in theory and practice and so has asked you to first demonstrate the foundation of your leadership approach. To do this, you will choose three theories—a combination of classic and contemporary—that you have studied in this course, in addition to selecting three leaders who exemplify your chosen theories. You will analyze each theory for its strengths and weaknesses and evaluate the leaders you have identified in relation to those theories. You will also identify and discuss three leaders who are anti-exemplary, as they will be used in the analysis portion of your project (shown in section II. C. below).

 

You will use the concepts and lessons from this part of the final project to inform the second part, in which you apply the theories to an organization and articulate your personal leadership philosophy.

 

Elements addressed:

I. Introduction
Introduce your three chosen theories and three chosen leaders that you identified, which align with those chosen theories. Be sure to provide a brief explanation of why you have selected these in particular. How do they apply to your personal leadership style or the development of one?

 

Sample Solution

Leadership, as I see it, is not a monolithic statue carved from a single ideal. It’s a vibrant tapestry woven from diverse threads, each representing a specific theory or leader who has left an indelible mark on my understanding of guiding and inspiring others. To understand the intricate patterns shaping my personal leadership philosophy, I delve into three distinct theories and three leaders who embody their spirit, alongside counter-examples that highlight the pitfalls to avoid.

My Theoretical Threads:

  • Transformational Leadership (Burns, 1978): This theory resonates with my belief in igniting passion and raising followers’ awareness beyond their self-interest to pursue a shared, inspiring vision. Leaders like Nelson Mandela, who galvanized entire nations against injustice, epitomize this approach, challenging the status quo and empowering others to believe in a better future.

  • Servant Leadership (Greenleaf, 1970): This theory strikes a chord with my desire to prioritize serving others and facilitating their growth. Leaders like Mother Teresa, who dedicated her life to alleviating suffering and empowering the marginalized, exemplify this style, putting the needs of their followers first and nurturing their full potential.

  • Situational Leadership (Hersey & Blanchard, 1969): This theory aligns with my understanding that leadership styles need to adapt to the context and maturity of followers. Leaders like Indra Nooyi, who transformed PepsiCo by adapting her leadership style based on team dynamics and market challenges, showcase this flexibility, maximizing team effectiveness through tailored approaches.

The Leaders in My Mirror:

  • Mahatma Gandhi: His nonviolent revolution, fueled by transformational leadership principles, instilled courage and moral agency in millions. He transcended self-interest, rallied followers towards a shared vision of freedom, and empowered them to challenge colonial oppression.

  • Wangari Maathai: Embodying servant leadership, she founded the Green Belt Movement, empowering Kenyan women to combat environmental degradation and poverty. By prioritizing local knowledge and community needs, she transformed lives and sparked a global environmental movement.

  • Winston Churchill: While not traditionally associated with servant leadership, Churchill’s wartime leadership demonstrated a situational brilliance. Recognizing the urgency and fear of his followers, he adopted a directive approach, providing unwavering resolve and rallying his nation amidst crisis.

Anti-Examples: Stepping Stones to Avoid:

  • Richard Nixon: His Watergate scandal exemplifies the perils of unethical and autocratic leadership. Focusing on self-preservation and control over transparency, he alienated his followers and eroded trust, showcasing the consequences of neglecting integrity and shared responsibility.

  • Idi Amin: His dictatorial regime stands as a stark reminder of the destructive nature of untamed charisma in the absence of vision and accountability. His exploitation of his followers’ trust for personal gain highlights the importance of balancing inspiration with ethical practices.

  • Marie Antoinette: Her callous indifference to the suffering of her people illustrates the devastating effects of an out-of-touch and elitist leadership style. Neglecting the needs and context of followers can result in resentment and ultimately, undermine the leader’s credibility and effectiveness.

By examining these diverse strands – theories, leaders, and counter-examples – I am able to weave a more nuanced and informed personal leadership tapestry. In the next section, I will delve deeper into the strengths and weaknesses of these chosen threads, exploring how they contribute to my leadership approach and inform my vision for leading teams and organizations.

This introduction represents the first 400 words of the 2000-word section. The remaining words will include a deeper analysis of each theory, exploring its strengths, weaknesses, and how it manifests in the chosen leaders. You can then analyze the anti-examples in relation to the leadership theories, highlighting the pitfalls they represent. Remember to connect all these elements to your own leadership development and vision, building a coherent narrative that showcases your understanding of leadership and your aspirations for the future.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.