Framework/care model

 

Provide a visual presentation of an idea for a population-based intervention program (PowerPoint). Provide support that this program is needed, feasible, and beneficial to the community. The presentation may be recorded or a well-written narration can be provided in the notes section of the presentation. Scholarly support from a minimum of 6 references is required. Include the following components in their presentation:

Background of need
Program description/design
Framework/care model
Stakeholders
Program Evaluation

Sample Solution

The relationship between the person and the clinician must be rethought in order to transform care delivery. The concept discussed here is a method for including patients more fully in their care. Assessing engagement capacity, exchanging information and options, planning, deciding interventions, and evaluating the efficacy of engagement interventions are the five encounters. Implications for practice, education, and policy are discussed in this report, which was created by researchers and validated by specialists. The Beveridge Model, the Bismarck Model, the National Health Insurance Model, and the Out-of-Pocket Model are the four primary health-care models. The Bismarck Model (also known as the “Social Health Insurance Model”) is a health-care system with limited resources.

iscuss about the comparison between the organization cultural of military forces between the British army that help in counterinsurgency of Malaysia(Malaya) and U.S Army that help in Vietnam War. The organization culture can be defined as a decisive determinant in their effectiveness and hence help to determine the course of international politics. In simple words, the organization cultural of military forces can be defined as the ability of military organization to adapt or to change whether that change occurs in military technology and in the structure of the international system. This organization cultural are one of the main component of state’s ability to guarantee their own security and their allies. The point that will be discuss is about the evaluating the literature on military innovation. As for the British Army, the civilian leaders in Britain which had institutional incentives to act as a unit that had an easier time agreeing for both policy goals and oversight options to ensure that the British army followed these goal that been framed by the leader’s. By setting these goals, the British army will react more flexibility to change their mind set same as the civilian leader’s goals. In contra, as for the U.S Army, the civilian leaders in the United State army which have an institutional incentive to act separately and found it harder to agree on policy goals which often to choose more complex oversight mechanism and did not always induce the U.S Army to respond easily. Besides that, the British army officer’s response directly with their political master cabinet which this will create a improve way of flexible military. As for the American system, the military has the ability to “trade off” demands that made by the congress that against the president. From the argument that been elaborate, we can conclude that different in political system of the government will led the nation’s politicians to create different militaries. Besides, the critical independent variable is not the nature of the national government which has the most cases that has a little impact on which policies the military to adopt but it is the organization culture of the military institution that determine whether innovation of the military will succeed or fail for each country. The other point of comparison for this paragraph is

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.