Framing and the Media

 

The paper should first define framing, explain its role in the presentation of news and summarize
the particular political issue that the student chooses to explore. Each student should select at
least two different media (newspapers, television, radio, or web based) sources to examine and to
select at least ten news stories NOT OPINION PIECES OR EDITORIALS) from each source
as the “raw input” for their examination. You should select sources so as to maximize potentiadifferent approaches to the issue and include at least one conservative and one liberal source.
For example, you could pair the more “liberal” New York Times with the more “conservative”
Wall Street Journal for an economic issue, and a European and an American newspaper to
examine discussions about NATO, the European Union, or the War in Afghanistan etc. It might
also be relevant to examine local vs. national views of a particular issue. The approaches of the
sources should then be summarized and compared. Finally, you should then consider the political
implications that these frames present. What is gained and what is lost in consideration of the
issues by each of the frames, what is considered and what is not and how does this influence the
way the public conceives of the issues?
If you have second (or third) language skills, you should consider adding a source with a
different linguistic tradition. This might prove very enlightening when comparing approaches to
the news and political issues as expressed in the liberal and conservative American news sources.
I.
Introduction: Please describe what it is you will be discussing, why –
as in importance, and interesting overall differences/points to be made. A brief
overview of study, don’t go into methods details but let us know what you are
analyzing. Perhaps by discussing that you are looking at conservative versus liberal
papers or looking at Mexican versus American viewpoint, etc. As opposed to listing
papers, dates, etc.
II.
Theory. Discuss Framing and all different aspects discussed in class
(or in readings) that apply to your paper. Liberal vs. Conservative bias,
thematic/episodic, international versus domestic, conglomerates – homogenization,
etc. How do these elements relate, or how could they relate to the issue you are
writing about.
III.
Describe study. Methodology. Media sources used, dates, search
terms, total numbers, etc. What you are looking at: headlines, word counts, etc.
IV.
Analysis of your media. Make comparisons and arguments here.
V.
Impact of these frames. How would one frame versus the other
potentially impact readers? Consider different audiences. What are the political
implications of seeing the story from these different frames?
VI.
Conclusion. Sum it all up; make some interesting broad points about
the findings. You could also mention some interesting further research that this study
suggests

Sample Solution

regards to the osmosis of pieces into lumps. Mill operator recognizes pieces and lumps of data, the differentiation being that a piece is comprised of various pieces of data. It is fascinating regards to the osmosis of pieces into lumps. Mill operator recognizes pieces and lumps of data, the differentiation being that a piece is comprised of various pieces of data. It is fascinating to take note of that while there is a limited ability to recall lumps of data, how much pieces in every one of those lumps can change broadly (Miller, 1956). Anyway it’s anything but a straightforward instance of having the memorable option huge pieces right away, somewhat that as each piece turns out to be more natural, it very well may be acclimatized into a lump, which is then recollected itself. Recoding is the interaction by which individual pieces are ‘recoded’ and allocated to lumps. Consequently the ends that can be drawn from Miller’s unique work is that, while there is an acknowledged breaking point to the quantity of pi

regards to the osmosis of pieces into lumps. Mill operator recognizes pieces and lumps of data, the differentiation being that a piece is comprised of various pieces of data. It is fascinating regards to the osmosis of pieces into lumps. Mill operator recognizes pieces and lumps of data, the differentiation being that a piece is comprised of various pieces of data. It is fascinating to take note of that while there is a limited ability to recall lumps of data, how much pieces in every one of those lumps can change broadly (Miller, 1956). Anyway it’s anything but a straightforward instance of having the memorable option huge pieces right away, somewhat that as each piece turns out to be more natural, it very well may be acclimatized into a lump, which is then recollected itself. Recoding is the interaction by which individual pieces are ‘recoded’ and allocated to lumps. Consequently the ends that can be drawn from Miller’s unique work is that, while there is an acknowledged breaking point to the quantity of pi

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.