Framing the Problem/Opportunity

What will Tesla do after their customer tax credit runs out that is given to them by the government? How will they compensate for the pricing that their customers will no longer receive? Tesla currently gives their customers a $4500 tax credit. Please include whatever charts or graphs that will be need to support the order completion.

 

Sample Solution

Framing the Problem/Opportunity

In a push to reduce carbon emissions, governments around the world have introduced incentives for automakers to develop electric vehicles or very low-carbon emitting cars. Credits are given to carmakers that build and sell environmentally friendly vehicles. As Tesla only sells electric cars, it receives these credits for free and can sell them at a huge profit to other automakers who can’t meet regulatory requirements. Tesla`s reliance on regulatory credits to generate profits is a red flag. It is not available to Tesla buyers any longer because Tesla has sold too many EVs to qualify. Numerous bills have been introduced to modify the electric-car tax credit program, including an extension for automakers like Tesla. The automakers continue to lobby for new legislation to make credits available to them once again.

was 17.8%, share of world population was 19% and share of world exports of goods and services was 10.7%. Furthermore, with rapid economic growth throughout China over the past few decades, there has been an ample decrease in poverty. The World Bank estimates that over the last 25 years, China’s poverty has reduced by 400 million people living off $1 US per day. Moreover, one of the largest impacts on China has been globalisation as economic growth was sustained at between 7% and 10% in the 1990’s and 2000’s, with business investment and net exports being the main ‘drivers of growth’. However, between 2011 and 2015, this growth rate began to fall (9.5% and 6.7%, respectively), as growth globally began to stall and China began to transition to domestic sources for growth, with a growing middle class society having a higher demand for more goods and services to consume domestically.

Contrastingly, Australia’s mixed market economy grew just 0.3% in the September quarter of 2018, slowing distinctly from 0.9% expansion in the previous period and missing market consensus of a 0.6% advance, being the weakest rate of expansion seen since the third quarter of 2016, due mainly to a piercing slowdown in private consumption and a pull-back in non-residential construction. However, like China’s economy, government spending went up 0.5% and consumer spending by 0.3% in the third quarter of 2018, supported by national government spending (1.9%) while local government and state government consumption dropped (-0.5%). The slight increase was driven by increases in insurance and other financial services (1.6%), transport services (1.8%) and food (0.8%), while there were falls in consumption of operation of vehicles (-1%), other goods and services (-0.7%) and the purchase of vehicles (-1.3%). Furthermore, total inventories have increased AUD$47 million in the third quarter of 2018. To conclude, Australia’s economy, as seen in the stimulus, has also consistently experienced a rate of GDP growth that is steady with the average growth rate slightly decreasing over the past 5 years.

China’s rapid rate of economic growth has led to a high level of resource use and environmental degradation, therefore experiencing severe environmental problems. The Chinese government has therefore commissioned the OECD to conduct a study of the environment in 2007. The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) is an intergovernmental economic organisation with 36 member countries, founded in 1961 to stimulate economic progress and world trade. This report discovered that by 2020, uncontrolled pollution would cause an approximate 600,000 premature deaths in urban areas, 20 million cases of respiratory illness per year and up to 7

This question has been answered.

Get Answer