Fundamental differences between a War on Drugs and a harm

    Outline the fundamental differences between a War on Drugs and a harm reduction approach to the control of drugs. Which do you find more successful    
Fundamental differences between a War on Drugs and a harm The U.S. government`s current strategy of trying to restrict the supply of opioids for non-medical uses is not working. While government efforts to reduce the supply of opioids for non-medical use have reduced the volume of both legally manufactured prescription opioids and opioid prescriptions, deaths from opioid overdoses are nevertheless accelerating. The increase is due in part to substitution of illegal heroin for now harder-to-get prescription opioids. Attempting to reduce overdose deaths by doubling down on this approach will not produce better results. Policymakers can reduce overdose deaths and other harms stemming from non-medical use of opioids and other dangerous drugs by switching to a policy of “harm reduction” strategies. Harm reduction has a success record that prohibition cannot match. These strategies would include medication-assisted treatment, needle-exchange programs, safe injection sites, heroin-assisted treatment, deregulation of naloxone, and the decriminalization of marijuana.

Comply today with Compliantpapers.com, at affordable rates

Order Now