Pick any ONE business/company of your choice. The company you choose can be a small local restaurant or a large multinational company. Based on your selection, answer the following questions:
In your paper,
Describe the basics of the business you chose- including the size of the business, types of goods/services the business sells, and possible barriers to entry/exit.
Distinguish among four market structures: perfect competition, monopolistic competition, oligopoly, and monopoly in this order.
Discuss what kind of market structure your company falls under. Why?
Analyze whether the demand of the goods/services sold by the business are elastic or inelastic. Why?
Discuss if there are any externalities involved. If so, explain how the externalities can be fixed.
Discuss any roles that larger companies can play in promoting inclusion, equality and reducing poverty.
Starbucks, the ubiquitous coffee chain with its siren logo beckoning from almost every corner, makes for a fascinating case study of market structures and social responsibility.
The Basics:
Market Structure:
Distinguishing among the four main market structures:
Demand Elasticity:
The demand for Starbucks’ products is relatively inelastic. Coffee is considered a daily necessity for many customers, and the premium pricing at Starbucks may not significantly deter them from their daily fix. Additionally, brand loyalty and the “experience” associated with Starbucks can further insulate it from price fluctuations. However, certain products like seasonal offerings or high-end beverages might have more elastic demand due to their price sensitivity.
Externalities:
Starbucks’ operations generate both positive and negative externalities:
Internalizing Externalities:
Starbucks can strive to minimize negative externalities and amplify positive ones through these measures:
Larger Companies Promoting Inclusion and Equality:
Larger companies like Starbucks can play a significant role in promoting inclusion, equality, and reducing poverty:
Starbucks has made efforts in these areas, from launching diversity and inclusion initiatives to supporting farmers through its C.A.F.E. Practices program. However, there’s always room for improvement, and continued scrutiny and public dialogue are crucial in holding large corporations accountable for their social impact.
Conclusion:
By understanding its market structure, demand characteristics, and the externalities it generates, Starbucks can navigate a complex marketplace while fulfilling its social responsibility to promote a more inclusive and sustainable future. As a global giant, its actions and commitments have the potential to significantly impact lives and livelihoods, making its choices on inclusion and equality all the more crucial.