Compose an essay of 1,000-1,250 words that incorporates the following regarding the Fusion Center: Identify your state’s primary fusion center(s). Discuss the various resources they provide to all your state’s various stakeholders. Affirm how you would best utilize these resources as an emergency manager for your community. Carefully review the multiple resources detailed in your state’s resource sections. Do you think the fusion center provides enough detail to properly inform its citizens how to respond towards threats of terrorism? Does it provide adequate local agency and federal government resources? Lastly, could you efficiently draw enough information to properly write a terrorism plan based from the information listed in your state’s fusion website. Yes or No? Explain. If not, what would need to be added to the fusion center to make it more useful? Be sure to cite three to five relevant scholarly sources in support of your content. Use only sources found at the GCU Library, government websites, or those provided in Topic Materials.
Sample Solution
Boolean strings. No Boolean strings were used.
Age of the Sources. After search results were parsed down in order to allow review of current significant research and literature, sources from the last 5 years were accepted as candidates for the literature review. One historical article was selected to complete the introduction section of this review.
Discussion
Due to practical constraints, this paper cannot provide a comprehensive review of the effects that various periodontal scaling instruments have on the damage or lack thereof to the surface of the dentin and the effects this has on patient periodontal disease progression. While a considerable amount of literature has been published on the efficacy and continued practice of scaling and root planing regardless of the instrumentation utilized. I found that there is very little research that can conclusively state any one periodontal instrument provides a statistically significant benefit over another when it comes to the effect that scaling has on the dentin surface and the resulting effect on periodontal disease progression. Previously published studies on the effect various periodontal instruments have on the surface quality are not consistent. The nature of the dentin surface quality has not been found to affect in one way or another the periodontal health of patients regardless of the surface roughness due to the large amounts of in-vivo studies, vs. in-vitro studies. While these and previous studies have measured the dentin surface quality post scaling with various periodontal instruments, surprisingly I was unable to find any studies that quantified the long term effect on patient’s periodontal health regarding the choice of instrumentation utilized. At this time a full discussion into the validity of my thesis on the proper utilization of the periodontal instruments available lies beyond the scope of the current research published.
Conclusion
Looking at these studies does one instrument produce less damaging out