Gender and sexuality

Instructions: In 3-5 full pages free of grammatical errors and devoid of typos, double-spaced sentences with no additional spaces between paragraphs, written with Times or Arial 10- or 12-point font, and 1” or 1.25” margins, answer the topical question at the end of these instructions using an argument-model of essay writing (see below).

According to sociologists like Kimmel and Ehrmann, men have to constantly prove their masculinity to others, making achieving it always elusive, and proof is always suspect. First, explain how and why sociologists consider male dominance over other subordinate men and women—is not explained by biological urges, but built into society’s social institutions (family, media, education, economy) and societal rewards for appropriate gender role behavior. Use Kimmel, Maccoby, McIntosh, Wade/Marx-Ferree, or other course materials in your answer. What makes this ideology of male dominance hegemonic, as defined in this course Then, reflect upon your own experience within a hierarchy of male dominance, paying close attention to intersections of other demographics relevant to your biography and who you are, such as your gender identity, sexuality, age, citizenship status, race, or other identity intersections explored in Wade/Marx-Ferree. How does your position in this hierarchy make you feel in terms of power over your life experiences thus far? How can you—on the micro-level of interactions—transform a hegemonic masculinity ideology in meaningful ways, if you want to at all?

Sample Solution

resembled a Soviet story about growing up for Shostakovich. He was framing a Soviet character Tolstoy expresses that the main development presents an emergency of the brain. The subsequent development gives a time of rest and help. In the third development Tolstoy accepts the Soviet character starts to rise. The finale speaks to triumph and development toward positive thinking. Tolstoy arranged the crowd response as an exhibit by the individuals that Shostakovich had transformed his melodic style. “Our crowd is naturally unequipped for tolerating debauched, miserable, skeptical workmanship. Our crowd reacts eagerly to all that is brilliant, clear, upbeat, hopeful, life-affirming.”[] At this time, Stalin was cleansing those contemplations and methods of reasoning that didn’t fit in with his beliefs of social authenticity. Numerous individuals endured during the Stalin period. Accordingly, this Symphony appeared to inspire a wide range of emotions. To a few, it was a representation of the grieving and misfortune caused by the system. Numerous individuals shed tears during the Largo part of the Symphony at the principal execution since it gave an outlet every one of that was happening in their lives under Stalin. The official partisan division was that the Fifth Symphony showed another course in the arranger’s interests. It was a change that Party had organized. The Party’s help was an exhibit of its capacity to cause a person to fit in with its convictions. In the Fifth Symphony, Shostakovich assuaged the gathering yet communicated his emotions and those of the general population.

As World War II overwhelmed the Soviet Union, and Leningrad fell under attack Shostakovich formed the Seventh Symphony. This orchestra was finished in December of 1941. Notwithstanding, as indicated by Shostakovich, the Seventh Symphony was considered before the assault by Germany on Leningrad. As he arranged the principal development, the barbarities of his legislature were chief in his considerations. At the point when the Nazi attack happened his contemplations appeared to change, and he was imagining the city \”that Stalin obliterated, and Hitler only polished off.” Shostakovich needed the music to portray wickedness and oppression caused by Germany on his nation and furthermore the malevolence and oppression being inflicte

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.