Genetic ancestry testing kits

 

You are probably all familiar with the widely available genetic ancestry testing kits that are advertised frequently on TV and in social and print media like 23 and Me and AncestryDNA. You might not be aware that there are now over two dozen companies offering this kind of testing to the general population! This speaks to the widespread interest in learning more about our ancestry as well as potential health conditions that might be lurking in our genetic code! But these tests aren’t cheap and before shelling out the big bucks, it’s important to really understand what information they can provide and what your results might mean! I’ve posted a recent article from Science on The Science and Business of Genetic Ancestry Testing.

Part 1: Read that and then I want you to do your own internet search…find an article or site that discusses the pros and cons of these tests to share with the group. Consider some of the following questions when drafting your post: What do you think of these tests? Would you pay for one? Would you take one if they weren’t cost-prohibitive? What part of the information they can provide is most interesting to you? Do you think the average person understands these tests and their meaning? Can you think of any negatives to making this kind of testing widely available?

Part 2: Please place your initial post, respond to at least 2 of your peers’ posts

Peer 1:

After reading this article I feel that it is less likely that I would purpose a genetic ancestry test. I think they can be fun however, they might not be applicable in a medical setting. Purchasers of these products should take the information they learn with a grain of salt. Especially because they match with DNA within their database, these databases are for-profit, and their databases are not peer-reviewed. I think a danger of these tests is taking the information to heart especially when the genetic tests provide information on health, longevity, and athletic ability. The one positive a see in these tests is that individuals are able to gain access to scholarships, housing, and educational opportunities by finding out information about who their ancestors are. This can provide a considerable amount of comfort for some.

Considering there is some risk and uncertainty of current tests’ accuracy I wonder if the growing feeling of Epigenetics, which considers how our ancestor’s life (trauma, good and bad choices) and our lifestyle choices directly affect our DNA by switching on and off of genes. I think if they were to take epigenetic factors into consideration it might help to improve the accuracy.

I reviewed an article for the University of Michigan that also considered the pro and cons of genetic testing. Above I mention how genetic tests can be a comfort to individuals, however, they can also reveal mutation which could affect individuals in their lifetime or their children (Joy, 2017). Rajani Aatre, a genetic counselor at the University of Michigan Cardiovascular Center points out, “The science is easy to process; the emotional component is not” (2017).

Aatre points out that a lot of consideration should be put in before purchasing a genetic test kit, even a recommendation from a primary care physician she suggests should come first before purchasing. Some pros are finding any possible mutations or becoming aware that there is no or only a small amount of risk of contracting a certain disease, and it can help to determine which medications would work well for the patient, and what lifestyle changes might be supporting the individual and their family. Cons are that not everyone is eligible for testing unless indicated by red flags in their family history, screening is tailored to specific areas (they cannot receive testing for everything), and testing might uncover information that is emotional to process. Additionally, insurance may only cover newborns, mothers who are expecting, and patients that qualify based on their family history.

Sample Solution

Identical twins have DNA that is nearly identical. So, if a pair of twins each submitted in a DNA sample for genetic ancestry testing, you’d expect they’d get the same findings, right? According to a recent research by the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation, this is not necessarily the case. In reality, the journalists showed that twins rarely get the same outcomes from the same company. And, depending on the sector, estimates of where an individual’s ancestors resided can differ greatly. One twin was told by 23andMe, a consumer genetics business, that she was 13 percent “Broadly European.” Meanwhile, the second twin’s DNA test revealed that she had only 3% “Broadly European” ancestry.

request to arrive at this they have 17 reasonable advancement objectives – among them is utilizing their income created from selling their items they put into developing business sectors that intend to be economical – this will assist with balancing the adverse consequences brought about by delivering concrete and total based items as these are exceptionally unsafe for the climate all alone. An illustration of a venture that they put resources into would be ‘Metropolitan public travel’ where LafargeHolcim was a significant partner in bringing the ultralight tramway line to Casablanca (2012). LafargeHolcim helped towards causing the city to become greener. They likewise give their own answers for add to the possibility of manageable development connected with energy and regular assets, they are offering answers for mining, balancing out soil and treating corrosive water. This demonstrates that they are additionally attempting to target maintainability inside their own particular market. LafargeHolcim express that “Foundation is can be innately maintainable” this is because of the additional speculation going into sustainable power and transportation in urban areas. They express that we want to think about supportability over the life expectancy of a venture (“support to grave”), so they have carried out groups towards focusing on this subsidizing.

Driving on from this one of the central issues of this article is to give detail on how associations figure out when these apparatuses are required. In many associations/organizations that work inside the development business they are completely mindful of the effect that they have on the climate however as of not long ago have decided to overlook it due to not having a triple primary concern, consequently they are only cognizant about turning benefits and have no respect for the catastrophy occurring around them as an impact of how they have encouraged their benefits. This is reasonable as up until the start of the 21st century it was the standard to not mind at all. Most organizations, for example, LafargeHolcim and Arcadis are flourishing today because of the experience that they have inside the business – meaning they have been in the game to the point of seeing what’s going on (since the nineteenth century). They are currently clearing up what they perhaps led when they were developing. That is one of the keyways that they can track down interest. This isn’t something to detract from them as they in all likelihood were unmindful of the drawn out impacts and it’s extraordinary to see that they are making a huge move these days.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.