Genetic testing Is beneficial but should be phased out eventually

 

1. Do you think that animal testing/experimentation has furthered our understanding and treatment of diseases? How has this week’s reading material influenced this belief?

2. Is there any evidence that some animal testing can be replaced with non-animal experimentation? What are some of the alternatives to animal testing? (This will require some searching online library services ie., Medline)

 

Sample Solution

Genetic testing is beneficial but should be phased out eventually

Scientists use animals to learn more about health problems that affect both humans and animals, and to assure the safety of new medical treatment. Some of these problems involve processes that can only be studied in a living organism. Animals are good research subjects for a variety of reasons. They are biologically similar to humans and susceptible to many of the same health problems. Animal research advanced the treatment of infections, immunization, improved cancer treatment, brain disorders, arthritis, and transplantation. Animal experimentation has furthered our understanding and treatment of diseases. For example, mice and other laboratory animals have been instrumental in the development of organ transplantation. By studying inbred mice with slightly different immune systems, researchers discovered that transplanted organs are rejected because of immunological reactions in the host. This work led to tissue typing techniques that make it possible to identify the best donor for an organ transplant.

Libya is faced with various internal issues which impact migration. Firstly the overall security situation. For instance, the lack of a central political actor has led to political, social, and economic instability, to an almost full devoid of the rule of law, to insecurity due to militias’ fighting over territory and political influence, and to an inability from organisations working in Libya to ensure policies’ implementation. Inter-community and inter-regional tensions have made international assistance and monitoring difficult, with organisations such as the IOM having to move its staff to Tunisia. Given the 2011 NATO-led intervention in Libya, the country also remains sceptical about foreign interference.

Another issue facing Libya is its high number of IDPs. According to the IOM’s Displacement Tracking Matrix, out of the 700,000 to 1 million migrants estimated in Libya, more than 370,000 thousand are internally displaced. IDPs commonly require humanitarian assistance and can represent a strain for their host communities due to possible scarce resources and overstretched basic services. They are also likely to seek illegal migration routes and to experience human rights violation.

Moreover, human rights violations in Libya are widespread and the victims are numerous. Migrants and asylum-seekers are “exposed to arbitrary arrest and abduction by militias and are regularly the victims of human trafficking and abuses by criminal groups.” The Libyan General Directorate for Combatting Illegal Migration (DCIM) is known to continuously perform unlawful systemic detentions of thousands of migrants. The inhumane conditions and violations undertaken in detention centres are well-documented and include exploitation, forced labour, shortages of basic necessities, medical treatment but also torture, kidnapping and rape mainly for extortion. Some detention centres are located in areas of fighting, putting the migrants directly at risk as was shown by the July 2019 Tajoura migrant centre airstrike. These detention centres are mainly populated by migrants intercepted at sea by the Libyan Coast Guard. The EU and particularly Italy’s continued support of Libya’s maritime activities which directly promotes detention practices needs to be reassessed.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.