1. Describe the history of the bill and the impetus behind it. You should be able to obtain this by e-mailing the author of the bill.
The Fair Trade Property Tax Credit Act of 2019 (HB 2087) was introduced in the Virginia General Assembly on January 8, 2019. The bill was proposed by Delegate Vivian Watts (D-Annandale), and co-sponsored by Delegates Mark Levine (D-Alexandria), Kaye Kory (D-Falls Church) and Lee Carter (D-Manassas). HB 2087 seeks to reduce property taxes for homeowners who have a high ratio of their income going toward property taxes compared to the national or state average. If enacted, this legislation would provide tax relief for those Virginia residents who are classified as “working class” but unable to receive existing tax credits due to their limited incomes.
The impetus behind HB 2087 is twofold; first, to create an equitable distribution of resources among all Virginians, regardless of income level. Second, providing financial assistance through reduced property taxes will allow working class individuals to remain in their homes and better invest in their communities. This bill has been crafted with consideration of the fact that rising housing costs have become increasingly burdensome for many lower-income earners across the Commonwealth–a problem further compounded by stagnant wages and rising living expenses. Moreover, its passage would bring much needed aid to those struggling most with numerous other challenges related to poverty such as access to healthcare and education opportunities for children from low income households
Delegate Watts expressed her hope that passing HB 2087 would make owning a home more affordable while allowing “ordinary citizens [to] stay in [their] neighborhoods” rather than being pushed out due economic pressures (“Virginia House Bill Proposes,” 2019). As she stated during her announcement: “We know how hard it can be simply trying just trying make ends meet month after month…so if you’ve worked hard enough that you can buy a house but still don’t make enough money so you don’t qualify these [existing] programs then we want fairness” (“House Introduces Bill,” 2019).
hool understudies. Her discoveries figure out that there was a huge connection between’s the respondents’ SES in view of yearly family pay and their scholastic exhibition. Her decision expressed that the grade 7 understudies’ financial status in light of yearly family pay was an indicator of their scholarly exhibition. Besides, her discoveries support the thought that neediness is relative, and that its presence or nonattendance doesn’t matter to understudies’ scholastic exhibition.
(Jabar et al., 2020) They concentrate because of financial status on parental association among Filipino guardians. Their review offers four significant discoveries. In the first place, the guardians for the most part are more connected with parental contribution at home than in school. Second, guardians in higher pay showed parental affiliation both at home and in school. Regardless, an alternate picture seemed while thinking about the subject evaluation of guardians about their everyday environment. Those families who trusted themselves to be very poor showed parental association at home and in school than the people who saw themselves to be in an ideal situation financially. Third, parental contribution in school was respectably higher among CCT (4ps) part guardians than their non CCT (4ps) partners. Fourth, relapse examination recognizes participation in CCT (4ps) as an indicator of parental contribution. Their review reasons that monetary assets from work or the CCT program could work with parental contribution in youngsters’ schooling, especially among guardians from somewhat big league salary family and low-pay families. Their paper proposes that more examination be finished into the impacts of pay uniqueness on parental contribution among low-pay guardians.