Policy analysis is a formal process in which the analyst assesses policy options aimed at solving an existing problem. Compared to the Week 7 assignment that examined the role of human rights and recommending a policy, the policy analysis follows prescribed steps. You will rely heavily on a recognized model of policy analysis described in Chapter 9, “Policy Analysis,” from Teaching Research Methods in Public Administration. Before you start, review this chapter and the instructions below, so you can choose a global challenge that fits the requirements of the assignment.
Instructions
Download the Week 10 Policy Analysis Template [DOCX]. It provides additional instructions for the assignment and space for you to add the assignment content. The assignment content should be at least four pages.
1. Policy Analysis Question: Communication of the problem and the goal to find a potential solution.
2. Historical Background: Content and extent of the problem as well as current or past policies.
3. Literature Review: Synthesis of information from at least four credible, relevant, and appropriate sources on the causes of the problem and policies applied to situations that are similar to the problem.
4. Stakeholder Assessment: Identification and analysis of at least four key stakeholders.
5. Policy Options and Assessment: Description of 3–5 policy options aimed at solving the problem, listing of policy evaluation criteria and assessment of policy options against these criteria.
6. Recommendation: Argument for the best policy option based on the analysis.
to the investigation of (Mendoza et al., 2016) Socioeconomic status assumes significant part in schooling. Not having monetary assets brought ramifications for the understudies. In investigation of (Villamor n.d) she decided the impacts of financial elements (SES) and the degree of self-viability corresponding to the scholarly exhibition of secondary school understudies. Her discoveries figure out that there was a critical connection between’s the respondents’ SES in view of yearly family pay and their scholarly presentation. Her decision expressed that the grade 7 understudies’ financial status in light of yearly family pay was an indicator of their scholastic presentation. Moreover, her discoveries support the thought that neediness is relative, and that its presence or nonattendance doesn’t matter to understudies’ scholastic exhibition.
(Jabar et al., 2020) They concentrate because of financial status on parental association among Filipino guardians. Their study offers four significant discoveries. Most importantly, the guardians by and large are more connected with parental association at home than in school. Second, guardians in higher pay showed parental affiliation both at home and in school. In any case, an alternate picture seemed while thinking about the subject evaluation of guardians about their everyday environment. Those families who trusted themselves to be very poor showed parental contribution at home and in school than the people who saw themselves to be in an ideal situation monetarily. Third, parental contribution in school was respectably higher among CCT (4ps) part guardians than their non CCT (4ps) partners. Fourth, relapse examination recognizes participation in CCT (4ps) as an indicator of parental contribution. Their review presumes that monetary assets from work or the CCT program could work with parental association in youngsters’ schooling, especially among guardians from somewhat top level salary family and low-pay families. Their paper recommends that more exploration be finished into the impacts of pay difference on parental association among low-pay guardians.
(Agullana et al., 2017) Examined the connection between senior secondary school understudies’ scholarly presentation and their financial elements in candon public secondary school. Finding of their review expressed that family pay, ethnic clan, guardians’ instructive fulfillment, religion, home, and family size have huge relationship with senior secondary school execution notwithstanding, each variable has different anticipating esteem. In the mean time guardians’ schooling don’t correspond by any stretch of the imagination. Finish of their review expressed that the understudy’s folks’ occupation don’t have importance as long as their occupation give them the enough monetary in