Going Beyond the Case

at
Categories
Tags

As you know, a core principle at JWMI is “learn it today; apply it tomorrow.” This assignment is a
continuation of the work you did in Part A, but the questions challenge you to go beyond simply analyzing
what Satya Nadella did at Microsoft. It is time to consider how you can apply the leadership principles
presented in the case to your own career. To prepare for Part B of this assignment, reread the entire case
and review the feedback you received from your professor on Part A.
Write a 6–7-page paper that draws links between the case and your own leadership journey. Of the six
topic areas below, select four (4) you would like to focus on.
1. Learning from Nadella’s Example
2. Building a High Performing Culture
3. Channeling Conflict
4. Effective Communication
5. Fostering Diversity and Learning
6. Building a Learning Organization

What did Nadella bring in terms of his own background (professional and personal) that
helped him to be successful in stepping into the CEO role?
b. What makes Nadella an “authentic leader”? What actions did he take that demonstrate
he believes in role-model management? Include references to course materials to
support your position.
c. What characteristics does Nadella display that most closely align to traits you have, or
aspire to develop, in your own leadership style? How are you most different from him in
your leadership style?
d. Why is it important for leaders to take (appropriate) risks?

Sample Solution

Here’s why progress might not be a linear trajectory from past to future, and how Hawaiian resistance and ancestral practice resurgence can be seen as futuristic:

Reasons progress might not be linear:

  • Setbacks and regressions:History is full of examples of societies experiencing periods of progress followed by setbacks, such as the collapse of empires or the Dark Ages in Europe. These periods can disrupt the linear narrative of progress.
  • Shifting definitions of progress:What is considered “progress” can change over time. For example, advancements in technology might lead to social or environmental problems, making the overall progress debatable.
  • Unequal distribution of progress:Progress often doesn’t benefit everyone equally. While some parts of the world might experience rapid advancements, others might be left behind, creating an uneven and non-linear picture.
  • Unforeseen challenges:New discoveries or unforeseen circumstances can disrupt previous notions of progress. For example, the discovery of climate change alters our understanding of what constitutes “progress” and forces us to re-evaluate its trajectory.

Futuristic aspects of Hawaiian resistance and ancestral practice resurgence:

  • Sustainability and resilience:Many traditional Hawaiian practices emphasize living in harmony with nature and sustainable resource management. This focus aligns with growing concerns about environmental sustainability and the search for solutions to climate change, making them relevant in the modern world.
  • Cultural preservation and identity:Reclaiming ancestral practices can empower communities and foster cultural identity, which is crucial in a globalized world with homogenizing tendencies. This focus on cultural preservation resonates with movements emphasizing diversity and inclusivity.
  • Decolonization and indigenous knowledge:The resurgence of ancestral practices can be seen as a form of decolonization, challenging imposed systems and reclaiming agency. This resonates with ongoing discussions about decolonizing knowledge and recognizing the value of indigenous wisdom.

Therefore, while progress might not always be a smooth linear path, Hawaiian resistance and ancestral practice resurgence offer valuable insights and practices that can contribute to a more sustainable, equitable, and culturally diverse future.

 

This question has been answered.

Get Answer