Great Books Publishing is continuing to grow

 

Great Books Publishing is continuing to grow. The customized eBooks line of work is continuing to expand, and they now have a lot of experience from the eBook projects that they have completed for their first eBook customer, a local college, and for their newer customers. However, as new projects come in and start to run into problems, some of the project managers in the project management office and their manager, Sophia, were discussing how it seems like it is déjà vu all over again – some of the same problems that they thought they had solved in working with supervisors and their teams on past projects keep on occurring. The eBook projects are functioning well, and customers are happy with the results. Repeat orders are coming in and new customers are turning to Great Books for their eBook production needs. However, there are just some problems that seem to keep popping up. One of the project managers even described dealing with these problems as being like playing the popular arcade game of “Whack-a-Mole” – as soon as you deal with one to make it disappear, the same one or another one just pops up. It seems like a never-ending struggle to try and solve some of these problems, especially when some seem like they were already solved on another earlier project.
In the PM handbook that Sophia had implemented, when projects were completed, the supervisors finished tracking all of the actual effort and costs and turned that information over to cost accounting for billing purposes. As Sophia and colleagues implemented the Project Management Office (PMO), they modified the PM manual to have a copy of this information also shared with the project management office. They have found this information to be sometimes useful as historical data to help develop estimates for new projects as requests for new eBooks come in from their customers.
The PMO team was discussing making changes to the PM manual and holding a short training for supervisors to implement some improvements to their project completion processes. They wanted to change their standard job template to incorporate these additions: • a planned task for supervisors to close out the project, • a task to lessons learned report, and • an optional task for a closing celebration for the team to mark the end of the project. They felt that it was important that the PMO start capturing lessons learned. These could be collated by the supervisors at the end of the project, or they could encourage supervisors to plan, schedule and hold a project closing meeting with their team members to thank the team members and to collect lessons learned from all of the team. They could also invite feedback or participation from the relevant Customer Service Representatives and account managers. The PMO received management approval for these changes, updated the PM manual, and held a brief training for supervisors. Supervisors liked the ideas, especially because the close-out meeting or team celebration would give them a chance to recognize and reward team members and would serve to motivate the teams for future projects.
As time went on, the PMO started collecting these lessons learned from many projects. The PMO staff started to look at the data from the lessons learned across the projects. They examined frequency of the six kinds of issues that were being encountered on the projects. Based on feedback from the leadership training that they had done with the supervisors, they had thought that the major cause of delays and extra costs on projects were part-time student employees calling off from work at the last minute, leaving planned work not performed until another resource could be assigned to it, which was often difficult as there were few slack resources. They felt that this made tasks late and sometimes delayed projects from completing on time. Their analysis showed that that wasn’t the case at all. In fact, only three of the problems on projects were caused by unplanned absences. In their Pareto analysis, the PMO staff identified three key problems, which they highlighted in red. Delays in obtaining necessary reprint permissions from certain publishers were the largest cause of problems, accounting for 34% of the problems encountered by eBook projects. Production staff calling in sick was the next most frequent problem, accounting for 28% of the problems. Customer changes, which often caused rework and delays, were the root cause of another 20% of the problems. The PMO now knew what the most important issues were that were causing eBook projects to be delayed and could make recommendations to mitigate each of these problems.

Comment on the following aspects of the case study:
a) What are some of the reasons why it is important to close out a project? What can project managers accomplish in closing out a project?
b) Why should projects capture lessons learned? What are some ways that the project team members, project managers and the organization can use lessons learned?
c) What benefits come from celebrating project accomplishments? Do you believe that rewards and recognition can serve as motivators for staff?
Write a 250 to 300-word paper.

 

 

Sample Solution

Closing out a project is the final step in the project life cycle and an important part of proper project management. It involves implementing all the necessary activities to bring a successful completion to any given project, while ensuring that all deliverables are met and no tasks have been left undone. When closing out a project, there are several key objectives that should be accomplished by the Project Manager:

 

The first objective is to ensure client satisfaction with their product or service. This includes communicating with stakeholders throughout the closure process to ensure any additional requirements or changes have been addressed in accordance with customer expectations. Additionally, it is important for managers to review all documentation from prior stages of the life cycle so that both parties can understand how each task was completed according to what was initially planned (Farr & Lindsay 2013). This helps foster better relationships between clients and providers.

The second objective for closing out a project is related to cost control. By confirming that all work has been completed up until this point as intended, including quality assurance testing on any materials produced, Project Managers can save time and money by taking proactive measures ahead of time rather than having costly errors discovered after launch (Cook 2014). They can also take steps such as collecting feedback from customers which will help further refine processes down the road.

Finally, closing out a project provides an opportunity for Project Managersto document key learnings from any successes or failures encountered along the way – identifying best practices moving forward (Kloppenborg & Petrick 2007). During this stage, it’s also important for teams to debrief on their experiences working together so they can reflect on what went well and what could be improved upon in future projects in order improve team performance overall.

In conclusion then, closing out a project serves numerous benefits not only in terms of customer satisfaction but also cost-efficiency and team performance improvements when done properly. As such, it pays dividends for organizations who take thoughtful care during this phase of their projects’ lifecycle (Galloway 2015).

at times supplanted by a quick n-bit convey spread viper. A n by n exhibit multiplier requires n2 AND doors, n half adders, and n2 , 2n full adders. The Variable Correction Truncated Multiplication technique gives a proficient strategy to re-ducing the power dissemination and equipment necessities of adjusted exhibit multipliers. With this strategy, the diagonals that produce the t = n , k least critical item pieces are disposed of. To make up for this, the AND doors that create the halfway items for section t , 1 are utilized as contributions to the changed adders in segment t. Since the k excess changed full adders on the right-hand-side of the cluster don’t have to create item bits, they are supplanted by adjusted decreased full adders (RFAs), which produce a convey, yet don’t deliver a total. To add the consistent that revises for adjusting mistake, k , 1 of the MHAs in the second column of the exhibit are changed to altered concentrated half adders (SHAs). SHAs are identical to MFAs that have an informat

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.