Hamstring Injury
Develop an article critique about Hamstring Injury (Maximum length 2 pages)
You must provide evidence to support your ideas and reference your evidence appropriately! (APA formatted) (2 minimum) (Original source and one more)
Follow the SES Article Critique guidelines below:
The review must be in APA format (cover page, headers, title, Times New Roman, 12 pt. font, etc.)
Please follow citation rules for paraphrasing and direct quotations.
Follow the format below. Your critique should follow this order. Please put in paragraph form.
Format/ What to include in paper:
1. Reference:
APA Reference at the top of your paper after your name and course information
2. Why are you interested in reading the article? (I am interested in this article to understand hamstring injuries more and ways I can prevent getting them.
What information can you gain by reading this article?
3. What is the main purpose of this article? Be specific and accurate. Summarize the purpose in your own words.
4. What is the key question the authors are asking?
5. What is the most important information in this article? Please make sure to answer each of the following:
Review the literature used.
Key things to look for – age of the references, guidelines used, what data/statistics from other studies is given
Authors reasoning for the study
Methodology
Research design
Results – review the statistics (significant or not)
Limitations (authors and your own)
6. What is the conclusion the authors came to about the study?
7. What are the implications of this article? What would the outcomes be if we followed the article’s findings? Include both positive and negative.
8. What is the significance of this study to you?
regards to the osmosis of pieces into lumps. Mill operator recognizes pieces and lumps of data, the differentiation being that a piece is comprised of various pieces of data. It is fascinating to take note of that while there is a limited ability to recall lumps of data, how much pieces in every one of those lumps can change broadly (Miller, 1956). Anyway it's anything but a straightforward instance of having the memorable option huge pieces right away, somewhat that as each piece turns out to be more natural, it very well may be acclimatized into a lump, which is then recollected itself. Recoding is the interaction by which individual pieces are 'recoded' and allocated to lumps. Consequently the ends that can be drawn from Miller's unique work is that, while there is an acknowledged breaking point to the quantity of pieces of data that can be put away in prompt (present moment) memory, how much data inside every one of those lumps can be very high, without unfavorably influencing the review of similar number