Has Google implemented a strategy that serves all stakeholder

 

(a) Respond to the 3 questions pg 435 (1 paragraph for each question).

1. Has Google implemented a strategy that serves all stakeholders?

2. How can Google respect privacy and still maintain its profitability?

3. How will increasing global regulation of privacy affect Google’s operations?

 

Sample Solution

Since its founding, Google has implemented a strategy that not only serves the company’s shareholders but also creates value for all of its stakeholders. The core of this strategy is to focus on providing innovative products and services that meet customer needs while maintaining a commitment to ethical business practices (Visser, 2016).

Google has taken numerous steps to ensure it is meeting the needs of all stakeholders. One example is its commitment to diversity within the workplace. By creating an inclusive environment at Google, the company ensures its employees feel valued and respected which helps create an engaged workforce that can be productive and innovate (Google Diversity & Inclusion , 2021). Additionally, they have invested heavily in training programs designed to help employees develop their skills so they can continue contributing positively to the organization as well as advancing their own careers (Google Learning Services , 2021)

The company also takes into account customer needs when designing product features or services. One example is Google Maps which integrates feedback from users through surveys or reviews in order to make improvements such as adding more detailed maps or user-friendly navigation features (Ozcanli et al., 2015). This open dialogue with customers allows them better serve everyone who uses their products and services.

Moreover ,the company also involves itself in various social cause like blocking websites hosting hate speech content, extending support for small business owners .These initiatives are thoughtfully crafted strategies helping google promote environmental sustainability along with building positive reputation among general public .(McLaughlin&Yalch 2020)
In conclusion ,google has indeed implements a comprehensive strategy serving interests of all stakeholders by creating valuable products &services along with involving itself social causes .By implementing these strategies google projects itself as socially responsible firm looking out for welfare both internal & external members.

Quality altering as of now has broad applications, for instance, in farming, and it has energized sees, with entire enemy of GMO developments occurring all over the planet. Vandana Siva, a social lobbyist from India vigorously advances naturally developed food and is emphatically against hereditarily changed crops in ranches (Navdanya, n.d). She accepts that ‘the general concept of GMOs is a mark of the end for biodiversity.’ She contends that the ‘respectability of life’ will never again exist when partnerships push out and promote the hereditarily changed crops which they produce (Greens-EFA, 2013). This paper centers around the utilization of quality altering in people, yet a reference to agribusinesses with regards to hereditarily changed food gives a valuable road to understanding how companies and enormous business mean to and are as of now involving quality altering for benefit.

Maybe the most well-known utilization of quality altering beyond clinical exploration in people, is in ‘architect children. ‘Since quality altering allows you to alter the hereditary code and change the attributes of anything, you can really make ‘originator children’, by changing the hereditary code of your prospective conceived undeveloped organism, giving it any trademark you need (Pang and Ho, 2016). In the cutting edge world, the corrective business covers more than 500 billion USD (Cosmetic market esteem around the world, 2018-2025 | Statista, 2018), which shows the sheer significance society puts on appearance. Victor Hugg, a social researcher composing for Iowa State Daily, says that “The quantity of individuals in our general public who put an excessive measure of significant worth on the actual appearance of themselves — and of others — is overpowering” and “each person makes decisions in light of somebody’s age, level, weight, hair, eye tone, etc” (Hugg, 2011) . Since society is so centered around appearance, essayists like Hugg contend that individuals believe appearance to be what directs their worth. This could prompt an ever increasing number of individuals utilizing quality altering to modify their kids’ appearances.

Magnificence principles have a gigantic impact in the cutting edge world. One might say that quality altering, and all the more explicitly, architect children, would empower social norms in regards to excellence to proceed and deteriorate. Ladies are feeling the squeeze to look a specific method for fitting in and adjust to the body standard at that point (Mazur, 2010). One year, blue eyes might be the norm, then it might change to brown in a couple of years. This is a comparative case with body shape. As per an examination directed in 2007, 90% of all

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.