Hazard adjustments assume that people live with a certain degree of threats that can be prevented or mitigated through certain actions. Pick three hazards that are prevalent in your hometown. What hazard adjustments would you recommend based on these three hazards?
Q6
Describe your understanding of qualitative research prior to your learning this week. How has it changed? Of the three stances described in Brinkmann (2014) (making the obvious obvious, making the hidden obvious and making the obvious dubious), which are you most drawn to? Finally, provide your overall reaction to this week’s material in the lessons and in Brinkmann (2014) and Watson and Vaidya (2013) given your initial assumptions about qualitative research.
Q7
Equal Opportunity or a Fair One?
Most employers tout being an “Equal Opportunity Employer.” In America, we promote both multiculturalism and diversity, but may not fully understand the differences. While multiculturalism may be great when thinking about cuisine and festivals, present an argument that some cultural practices should not be embraced for America to maintain its identity. Also, does it not make more sense to recognize diversity and promote a “fair” opportunity rather than an equal one?
Hazard Adjustments
Here are some examples of prevalent hazards and recommended adjustments:
Qualitative Research
Before diving into specific readings, here’s a general understanding of qualitative research and how it might have changed for you:
Brinkmann’s Stances (2014):
Choosing a Stance:
The most appealing stance depends on your research goals. If you want to uncover hidden cultural norms, stance #2 might be most interesting.
Overall Reaction:
This week’s material likely challenged your initial view of qualitative research. You might find it more nuanced and valuable than previously thought.
Equal Opportunity vs. Fair Opportunity
Here’s a breakdown of the concepts:
Arguments for Fair Opportunity:
Conclusion:
Promoting “fair opportunity” might be more effective for achieving diversity and inclusion while safeguarding America’s core values.
Remember, these are just starting points. You can adapt the hazard adjustments to your specific location and delve deeper into qualitative research stances and the equal vs. fair opportunity debate.