Healthcare Coverage Gap

 

The ACA was meant to provide quality health care coverage for all yet a coverage gap for some populations especially in states that oppose Medicaid expansion. Based on what you have learned so far in this course, create a PowerPoint presentation that addresses the coverage gap problem, who is impacted by the coverage gap, the role the ACA plays in the coverage gap, why the coverage gap should be closed, and solutions/ recommendations for closing the gap. Address the following in your PowerPoint:
• Select one state opposed to Medicaid expansion and describe why. Then, consider your own state (my state is Georgia). What are the benefits and drawbacks to Medicaid expansion in your state?
• Define what the coverage gap is (problem/issue)
• Discuss how the coverage gap impact low income healthcare consumers population.
• What role does the ACA have in widening or closing the coverage gap?
• Why is it important to close the gap (implications for positive social change)?
• What are some solutions to closing the coverage gap and how can healthcare equity help close the gap? Include recommendations and/or solutions.

Sample Solution

People with income below the poverty level are not eligible for the Affordable Care Act`s (ACA) premium tax credits (premium subsidies), and if they are in a state that has refused to expand Medicaid eligibility under the ACA, they may not be eligible for Medicaid either. That leaves them in a situation in which they are living in poverty but also ineligible for financial assistance with their health insurance. The coverage gap is currently only a problem in 11 states, and it is entirely caused by those states` decision to not expand Medicaid. The ACA did not create any sort of coverage gap; it was purposely designed to ensure that there would be no coverage gaps for low-income Americans, even for recent immigrants (as long as they are lawfully present in the US).

elite, while the majority of Soviets were suffering; the standard of living in the Soviet Union was one third of the standard of living level in America and less than half of West Germany and France (Johnson & Raynes, 1984, page ii). Low standards of living generally guarantees unrest with populations because people are likely unsatisfied with their economic situation. The downfall of the Soviet Union is evidence of the fact that governments are unstable when their preferred system of economics is not capitalism.

Capitalism supports equality in nations, because capitalism supports equal opportunity vice versa. Capitalism is sustainable because it is often accompanied with socialist political policies. Equal opportunities give more people the means to support themselves. Though there may be economic inequality in capitalist states, there isn’t widespread poverty at the same level as in communist nations. This is because the people who are motivated enough to sustain themselves will find a way to achieve what they want.

 

 

Major financial support is provided under communist governments. Theoretically this is a beneficial policy, but realistically it isn’t as beneficial as it is intended to be. At least 20 percent of Soviets lived in poverty compared to 14 percent of Americans in 1988 (Fein, 1989). The average Soviet only has to dedicate 6 percent of their income to paying rent, whereas Americans dedicate 26 percent of their income to living expenses (Fein, 1989). The Soviets denounced the existence of poverty in their country up until Gorbachev’s leadership, and instead claimed that poverty was only brought on by capitalism. The large number of people who were experiencing economic hardships sought for change in the USSR. Despite Soviet officials claiming that the poverty was caused by laziness, many believe that poverty was brought on by the economic state of the USSR. The economy under Gorbachev suffered immensely, causing over 20 million people to live impoverished lives (Fein, 1989). The communist Soviet Union crumbled soon afterward.

A defining factor of a capitalist economy is its economic freedom. The five most economically free nations are Hong Kong, Singapore, New Zealand, Switzerland, and Australia according to the Index of Economic Freedom (2018). Hong Kong is a part of China, yet the only things the Chinese government controls in Hong Kong is foreign relations and the military. The population grew in Hong Kong from 600, 000 to 6 million in fifty years (Friedman, 1998). This population growth was due to people fleeing from the communist state of China to Hong Kong. A major downside to reduced economic freedoms, is the reduced political freedom that typically comes with it. Both issues have gradually diminished in China since the heig

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.