Homosexuality

at
Categories
Tags

 

 

 

Is homosexual sex morally legitimate?Whyor why not?
Assigned readingWaller, Bruce N. Consider Ethics: Theory, Readings and Contemporary Issues. 3rded. Toronto/Montreal: Pearson Longman, 2011.Chapter 18,“Homosexuality.” InstructionsWrite an argumentative essay of 1,250–1,500 words(5-6pages),answering the following question:Is homosexual sex morally legitimate?Whyor why not?Support your argument by referring to one of the articles Waller includes, and defend your argument against the point of view expressed in the second article. To persuade your reader of the validity of your decision, choose oneof the ethical theories discussed so far and argue from the point of view it presents.If you choose to use outside sources as evidence to support your argument, they must be cited appropriately in the body of your essay and included in a bibliography at the end. You may cite your references in any one of the standard forms (MLA, APA, Chicago, etc.

 

Sample Solution

Homosexuality

Recently, there has been a whole lot of debate about the practice of homosexuality in some countries. Homosexuality, which is commonly referred to as same sex relationship or marriage has been rejected not only on grounds of destroying the sense of identity of those who engage in it but also on the basis of negating the order of creation thereby threatening the viability of many African communities. This paper employs the natural law theory of morality in order to explain that since what is natural is morally right and what is unnatural is morally wrong. The claim that human beings are governed by certain innate or basic laws rather than legislated laws has been the central assumption of the natural law theory in ethics (Fox and DeMarco, 1990:121). Homosexuality acts are morally wrong because according to this theory, it is morally right for an organism to act in accordance with its inherent nature and if this is the case, then any act (homosexual inclusive) that is contrary to human nature and reason is forbidden and therefore wrong.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rifle Poem

There was a break in the demeanor of the rifle, and I split with a deadly solid until it broke with another split. Since long echoes of cockroaches are lingering palpably, they may shake like smoke. It was not unfathomable during the chasing time frame, yet these country woodlands were loaded with deer. In any case, don’t do this, I considered lopsided cleaned particles of my first rifle knob, weight of the shoulder, and activated wear during use.

By all accounts, “rifle” is a sonnet about essential and optional scorn, it postpones the agreement and makes a composed agreement. This is line 6. “After I grew up, I smelled it frequently in the group.” We comprehend that the smell of sulfur takes after the annoyance of shouts individuals feel. The last line is equivalent to what she is stating: “In the event that it isn’t because of this snag, you realize I will never really individuals, you know who I am discussing “Not in China, she will discover different reasons, restricted all together not to do what she knows

What about “Attack Rifle”? Are not they progressively risky? No, they don’t exist for a straightforward explanation. There is nothing unique in relation to the day by day non-ambush rifle like “Attack Rifle”. Since around 1885, the fundamental innovation of the rifle has scarcely changed. Most rifles as of now being used today, incorporating the mainstream boogeeman in the media, AR – 15 are little variations of the essential rifle configuration utilized for chasing, firing, lawfulness, battle, psychological oppression, hostile to – fear based oppression is. A portion of the rooms are woody in appearance and look rich and exquisite. A few people are dark, sharp and frightening. They are in fact vague. (The main exemption is that the jolt activity rifle is as yet the best option for certain trackers and shooters)

 

 

This question has been answered.

Get Answer