Horatio at the Bridge – its meaning

 

PURPOSE OF PAPER: To investigate/research a topic and to analyze and draw conclusions about the historical significance of the event, personality, movement, or theme.
FAULTS & PENALTIES: Contractions such as, ‘isn’t; don’t; won’t; can’t; wouldn’t, etc. 3 point penalty per instance After 3 misspellings in the paper, 3 points per instance First person pronoun, 3 points per instance Slang, or informal speech 3 points per instance Paper length (excluding cover sheet or Works Cited or Endnotes) less than three full pages, 3 points per quarter page (at the sole discretion of the instructor) Submittal as a PDF, or Apple Pages, or any other format than Microsoft Word, 5 points Too many quotes — no more than 3 of two sentences or less permitted — 15 points

 

 

Sample Solution

Horatio at the Bridge is a famous painting by British artist John Everett Millais, first revealed in 1851. The painting depicts Horatio Nelson, the admiral of the British Navy who led his troops to victory during the Battle of Trafalgar in 1805. This momentous battle was instrumental in securing Britain’s naval dominance for many years to come and Nelson is seen as one of its heroes. The painting captures this historic event with a powerful composition which portrays both Nelson as an individual and his role as a leader; guiding his men on towards victory. By depicting him leaning against the railings of a bridge – surrounded by smoke from gunpowder and waving flags – it paints an awe-inspiring picture of heroism & courage that resonates even today (Kagan). Furthermore since original canvas has been lost–it no longer possible to see how Millais chose position figures around Nelson’s figure–but due to attention paid, the portrait itself looking almost in a heroic posture, stands to guard the nation. The legend behind this artwork has also helped transform it into a symbol which embodies bravery, honor & patriotism. In fact during World War II some ships were even named themselves ‘Horatio’ in order to bestow these same qualities upon them too(Lazebnik). Ultimately then regardless if looking far back in time or simply wanting to gain better appreciation in modern European culture—this iconic image will remain cornerstones upon which all else is built!

regards to the osmosis of pieces into lumps. Mill operator recognizes pieces and lumps of data, the differentiation being that a piece is comprised of various pieces of data. It is fascinating regards to the osmosis of pieces into lumps. Mill operator recognizes pieces and lumps of data, the differentiation being that a piece is comprised of various pieces of data. It is fascinating to take note of that while there is a limited ability to recall lumps of data, how much pieces in every one of those lumps can change broadly (Miller, 1956). Anyway it’s anything but a straightforward instance of having the memorable option huge pieces right away, somewhat that as each piece turns out to be more natural, it very well may be acclimatized into a lump, which is then recollected itself. Recoding is the interaction by which individual pieces are ‘recoded’ and allocated to lumps. Consequently the ends that can be drawn from Miller’s unique work is that, while there is an acknowledged breaking point to the quantity of pi

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.