“House Call Company” case 2015 – House Call Company Case

 

Review the “House Call Company” case 2015 – House Call Company Case Only.pdf 2015 – House Call Company Case Only.pdf – Alternative Formats and consider this business owner’s response to operating his business based on Biblical principles. In your case study paper, respond to the following questions:

In what ways was Thomasson seeking to demonstrate his faith on the job? Where do you see the influence of Thomasson’s faith as having an impact on his decision to rehire Whiting?
Can we adequately measure how much of our faith can or is demonstrated in our decisions?
Should Thomasson’s approach to managing his business, so strongly focused on adherence to following specific processes, be mitigated by his faith, since he was so convinced that his way was the best way that he had to consider terminating Whiting a second time because Whiting would not follow his recommendations?
How would you balance your faith and the realities of business in making a termination decision?
Is the expression of faith the real issue in this case? What about leadership style? If the two main protagonists in the case (Thomasson and Ward) both share a fa

Sample Solution

The “House Call Company” case describes an actual small business and the efforts to grow the business by the original owner. The case addresses a demonstration of the owner`s faith by his rehiring a worker who was previous terminated. The founder and owner of the business, Thomasson, grapples with the perceived failure of the person who he has rehired; as well as with letting go of his directive leadership approach to allow others to lead; and a contrasting leadership style. The case presents challenges for students to consider not only the expression of their faith but also the different types of approach to managing a small business.

Costco’s greatest capability is its lean operating strategy. By operating as lean as possible, Costco is able to financially flourish while offering extremely competitive prices for merchandise sold. According to “The Magic in The Warehouse” by Neal Gabler,

“Costco is a lean company. The company’s spending on basic overhead—the selling, general, and administrative category—is only 10% of revenues, compared, for example, with about 20% at Walmart. Among Costco’s efficiencies are the fact that it doesn’t advertise; it has a limited selection—only 3,700 products compared with 140,000 at a Walmart superstore and half a billion at Amazon. That allows Costco to drive hard bargains with suppliers. And it has created a distribution system that, according to Galanti, fills 95% of its freight capacity, an unheard-of number.” [3]

As referenced above, Costco is able to use lean operations to reduce costs as much as possible. Minimizing advertising expense, low overhead costs, and efficient logistics enables Costco to maintain profitability while realizing slim margins. This effect is passed along to the customer by offering extremely competitive low costs.

From a VRIO perspective, this capability can be classified as valuable, rare, and organized in a way to capture value. The exception to this is the fact that imitating a lean operation would not necessarily be costly. This is due to the fact that any firm deciding to pursue lean operations will likely be able to recoup any reorganizing and strategic costs associated with running lean.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.