How Christian principles can be applied to an accounting fraud case.

 

Discuss how Christian principles can be applied to an accounting fraud case. In a 500-750-word paper,

Review “Fraud Case 8-1,”
Levon Helm was a kind of one-man mortgage broker. He would drive around Ten-nessee looking for homes that had second mortgages, and if the criteria were favor-able, he would offer to buy the second mortgage for “cash on the barrelhead.” Helm bought low and sold high, making sizable profits. Being a small operation, he employed one person, Cindy Patterson, who did all his bookkeeping. Patterson was an old family friend, and he trusted her so implicitly that he never checked up on the led-gers or the bank reconciliations. At some point, Patterson started “borrowing” from the business and concealing her transactions by booking phony expenses. She intended to pay it back someday, but she got used to the extra cash and couldn’t stop. By the time the scam was discovered, she had drained the company of funds that it owed to many of its creditors. The company went bankrupt, Patterson did some jail time, and Helm lost everything

Sample Solution

graphically and which is fit for recognizing the labor and products of one individual from those of others and may incorporate state of merchandise, their bundling and mix of tones.” Non-traditional exchange marks have turned into the worry of makers decently as of late with the development being used of creative promoting and marking systems. Non-regular exchange marks are those which are past the domain of the definition given in the regulation and begin from sounds, smells, tastes, surfaces, and so forth While the regulation doesn’t unequivocally avoid such exchange denotes, the utilization of the words “fit for being addressed graphically” limits the extent of the definition. Prior, as per Rule 2(1)(k) of the Trade Mark Rules, 2002, ‘graphical portrayal’ essentially implied portrayal in paper structure. In any case, the most recent Rule 2(1)(k) of the Trade Marks Rules, 2017 characterizes ‘graphical portrayal’ as portrayal of an exchange mark for labor and products addressed or equipped for being addressed in paper structure and remembers portrayal for digitized structure. With the consideration of portrayal in digitized structure, the extent of the term ‘fit for being graphically addressed’ has extended significantly. This correction is a beam of expectation for owners of non-ordinary exchange marks like scent stamps or movement marks which are not equipped for being graphically addressed in the customary sense. The term ‘digitized structure’ has a wide extension for translation and might be utilized by owners for their potential benefit. ‘Digitized structure’ could be perceived to mean an advanced variant of a graphical portrayal, say a delineation in a pen-paper organization or it might mean computerized information like brief snippets or mp3 accounts if there should arise an occurrence of sound imprints. Permitting exchange imprints to be carefully recorded is an enormously moderate advance for non-ordinary exchange marks and their enrollment.

Sorts of Non-Conventional Trade Marks
Sound Mark
Sound imprints are a sort of non-traditional exchange mark wherein the particular sound or sound means that the beginning of the imprint. Today a novel sound or mix of sounds or a mark sound, is one of the most remarkable promoting instruments. Infectious jingles are a splendid method for guaranteeing the purchaser connects the item or brand with said jingle, for example sound imprint. Nonetheless, because of the utilization of the words ‘equipped for being graphically addressed’, sound imprints are frequently difficult to get enlisted. Because of the incorporation of advanced structure in graphical portrayal, enlistment of sound imprints is presently generally more straightforward. Prior, when graphical portrayal was restricted to pen and paper design just, it was felt that an evident arrangement is store a computerized recording of the sound with the recorder. However, this recommendation was dismissed by the International Trademark Association (INTA) as being unreasonable, for first and foremost, sound can’t be distributed by the Trademark Registry and individuals would need to go to the vault to hear it, and also, it would be challenging for the library to store such countless sound examples. However, these issues appeared to have been handled by not just the new Trade Mark Rules of 2017, yet additionally by broad innovative headways. With admittance to the web and limitless distributed storage, the INTA’s anxieties stand excess. The very first sound imprint to get regist

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.