How Democratic is the American Constitution?

 

 

 

What does the author mean by “How Democratic is the American Constitution?”
What are major themes to understanding Democracy, American politics and elections?
Do think differently about the Constitution, the U.S. Senate or the effectiveness of the electoral college based on Dahl’s analysis?

Sample Solution

The question of “How Democratic is the American Constitution?” has been pondered and debated for centuries, reflecting on lessons from past failures and successes in our nation’s quest for representative government. Major themes to understanding democracy, American politics, and elections include:

1) The structure of the U.S. Government: The United States Constitution outlines a system of federalism which divides power between the national government and state governments while also establishing checks and balances among different branches (Friedman & Jandl 2020). This ensures that no one branch holds too much power while allowing both levels to collaborate on policy issues to better serve their constituents.

2) Popular sovereignty: This concept refers to the idea that it is ultimately up to the people or citizens of a country to make decisions about how they are governed through voting in elections or participating in public discourse (Schudson 2016). This is further reinforced by enshrined rights such as freedom of speech which enables citizens to express their opinion without fear of retribution from those in positions of authority.

3) Representation: A key part of democratic systems is having representatives who accurately reflect the diversity within society while still representing their own interests. This can be achieved through proportional representation electoral systems where seats are allocated based on each party’s share vote (Carrera et al., 2020), rules requiring political parties nominate diverse candidates, or implementing legislative mechanisms such as superdelegates within representative bodies like Congress.

4) Fairness & Equality: It is important for any democracy that all members receive equal treatment regardless if they belong.

This article examines and attempts to explain public scepticism surrounding the European Union (coined Euroskepticism). Since 1990, there has been an increasing move to make European Union decision making more democratic with increased oversight of national parliaments, greater powers for the European Parliament, majority voting within the Council, and an increase in EU referendums. This has sought to bring to an end to an era where European elites bargained treaties in the shadow of an apathetic and generally approving public. Hooghe seeks to understand what drives European Union decision making in the modern era, as well as Euroskepticism. This move was embodied in the rejection of the European Constitutional Treaty in 2005, forcing a rethink of the permissive consensus that the people in charge of the European Union were above accountability. To this day, the matter of European integration has been strictly labelled as a contentious issue.

Hooghe begins his examination by establishing two, diametrically opposed theories of European Union politics. One theory is a bottom up view of preference formation. In this argument, voter’s preferences provide a structure of incentives for party position in the context of electoral competition. Whichever party can best capitalise on voter preferences will be better situated to acquire political power. In the context of the European Union, policy makers must gauge the public mood on European integration and make decisions from that.

 

 

Another theory is the top down approach, whereby political parties cue and directly influence the opinions and decisions of the public. Political parties, according to this theory, hold the ideological maps to help navigate highly technical and multi-faceted issues (such as those facing European integration). The public can rarely grasp the complexities of these issues, and thus look to political parties for guidance.

Hooghe, in his analysis, agrees with the bottom up approach to explain Euroskepticism. Euroskepticism, then, is best understood as a rational response by citizens (and thus political parties) for whom centralized European Union power is a threat to their own personal interests, not as a result of dissent o

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.