How finance embraces uncertainty. Without uncertainty

 

 

1.It is said that finance embraces uncertainty. Without uncertainty, there is no finance. Do you agree? Briefly explain.

2.In your own words, briefly describe agency theory as it applies to corporate finance. Describe the differences between legal and moral- ethical agency problems. Provide an example of each.

3.Briefly outline some of the new risks businesses face in today’s environment. If you were the CEO of a firm in today’s business environment, how would you manage these risks? Explain briefly.

4.If you invest $ 4,600 today, how much would you have in your account 32 years from now if interest rates are 12.2725% per year?

5.You want to receive $ 10 million in 45 years for a major purchase. If a financial institution offers 4.795 % per year, how much should you invest (one time) today to make this happen?

6.You want to save up for retirement in 25 years. Hence you decide that you can afford to save $ 428 per month (at the end of the month), with the first payment to be made at the end of month 1. If the bank offers you 8.475% per year on your investment, how much will you have accumulated at retirement?

7.You are now 25 years old. In 20 years, you hope to be able to buy a small investment property currently worth $ 14,000, but expected to appreciate at the rate of – 1% (minus 1%) per year. You plan to make equal quarterly payments and the bank if offering you 6.45% on your investment. How much should you invest every quarter to be able to purchase the property?

8.You want to buy a house that currently costs $ 250,000. The bank requires 10% down and 20-year mortgage rates are around 2.75%. Ignoring other costs and expenses associated with the house, what would your monthly payments be?

9.You want to buy your dream car. Its sticker price is $ 75,000. The bank is offering you financing at 2.485% for 72 months. If you are required to make a 15% down payment, estimate your monthly payment.

10.Consider the car purchase in the previous question. The price is still $ 75,000. You have decided that you cannot afford this payment. Instead, you prefer leasing the car. Ignoring other considerations with leasing, compute the revised monthly payments. Leasing is slightly more expensive – at 4.05%, and is offered for 48 months. At the end of the lease period, you can buy the car for its residual “blue book” value of $ 32,000, or return the car. Assume you will still need to make a 10% down payment on the car.

 

 

 

Sample Solution

simulative monetary policy to solve the recession. The fall of Keynesianism also credited to the fact that many economists did not take into account the probability of stagflation (Blinder, 2013). Historical data pointed out that high unemployment rates were related with low inflation rates and vice versa, as shown in the Phillips curve (Khan Academy, 2017). The theory was that a high demand for goods increased prices, which in turn stimulated companies to employ more people. Likewise, high employment rates augmented demand. During the 1970s stagflation, it became obvious that the link between inflation rates and employment levels was sometimes unstable. As a result, macroeconomists were unconvinced about Keynesianism, eventually steering to the end of the impact of Keynesian theories in economic strategies. Monetarist economists, such as Edmund Phelps and Milton Friedman clarified a shift in the Phillips curve: they maintained that when companies and workers anticipated high inflation, there was a shifting up of the Phillips curve, suggesting that high inflation can occur at any rate of unemployment (Khan Academy, 2017). Unambiguously, they argued that if inflation remained high for many years, workers and companies would begin emphasizing its consequences during wage negotiations, causing in a quick increase of earnings and firms’ prices, which further quickened inflation. This enlightenment was an extreme case of criticism of Keynesianism, and Keynesians progressively agreed the explanation. This reduced Keynesianism spread and influence on economic policies. To conclude, it is evident that the spread and impact of Keynesianism was largely accelerated by the unmatched economic success and constancy in the post-war period from 1945 until 1973. The basis of Keynesianism was government intervention using active monetary and fiscal actions to normalize aggregate volatility in market economies. Its collapse could have accredited to the 1970s stagflation depicted by an instantaneous increase in both unemployment and inflation rates. Critics maintain that stagflation was an unavoidable heritage of demand management policies associated with Keynesian economy. The critical fall of Keynesianism was noticed by the end of the neoclassical synthesis conventional position because of empirical and theoretical weaknesses. The fall of Keynesianism was also triggered by the fact that many economists of that time did not take into account the probability of stagflation.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.