How Gandhi grew support for the the Salt March

Consider, how did Gandhi grew support for the the Salt March?
How did Gandhi incorporate women into the Salt March?
How and why was this event ultimately linked to the broader movement for both Indian independence and international movements for women’s rights?

Sample Solution

How Gandhi grew support for the Salt March

The Salt March, which took place from March to April 1930 in India, was an act of civil disobedience led by Mohandas Gandhi to protest British rule in India. During the march, thousands of Indians followed Gandhi from his religious retreat near Ahmedabad to the Arabian Sea coast, a distance of some 240 miles. Britain`s Salt Act of 1882 prohibited Indians from collecting or selling salt, a staple in their diet. Indian citizens were forced to buy the vital mineral from their British rulers, who, in addition to exercising a monopoly over the manufacture and sale of salt, also charged a heavy salt tax. The march resulted in the arrest of nearly 60,000 people, including Gandhi himself. India was granted its independence in 1947.

David Rees argument for the motives behind the Marshall plan are traditionalist, and were written during the 1960s when the common perception of the Cold War that the USA were defending freedom and capitalism. This outlook can easily be explained as the sources he uses are largely official documents from the US government “Foreign relations of the United States”, and memoirs and bibliography’s from US congressmen.

Yergin analysis and explanation

A third works that investigates the motives behind the Marshall Plan comes from Daniel Yergin in The Shattered Peace. His interpretation of the motives is that the political scene in Europe and the divisions between the US and communism were responsible for the plans introduction. Yergin also touches upon the economic factors that play into the political conflict and the impact it has on the Communists influence in Europe. However, these were of a humanitarian nature and were not to do with self-interest for the Americans as the Kolko’s believed they were. He describes Europe as being in “an economic crisis with momentous political ramifications” and that the Marshall plans two aims were “to halt a feared communist advance… and to stabilize an international economic environment favorable to capitalism”. Yergin claims that the two factors fuse together to form the Marshall plan.

Yergin suggests that the Truman doctrine was failing, as US policy was focused on acting against the soviet sphere. He interprets this as being a long term motive behind the plan and that it was introduced to create a shift in US policymaking towards creating a Western Sphere to block any further spread of the communist regime. He argues that the Marshall plan was “the last great effort, using the powerful and attractive magnetism of the American economy, to draw these countries out of the Soviet orbit”. Yergin uses Truman’s point that “There are other places where we can be effective”, highlighting how a consolidated Western Sphere is more significant than a weakened Soviet sphere. To extend this Yergin breaks down the consolidation of Europe and says that the recovery of Germany was a motive behind the plan as he believed the security and development of the other western countries was based on its survival. He says “Western Germany was presented as essential for the recovery of its non-communist n

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.