How plausible was the Reconstruction agenda of the Radical Republicans

Discuss how plausible was the Reconstruction agenda of the Radical Republicans?
In answering this question, first describe that agenda. What did the Radical Republicans want?
Second, identify the opponents of the agenda, and the barriers they put in the way.
Third, explain how and on what issues the barriers were or were not overcome.
Fourth and finally, account for the end of Reconstruction and indicate how it might (or might not) have been
different.

Sample Solution

The Radical Republicans were a group of American politicians within the Republican Party of the United States from around 1854 (before the American Civil War) up to the end of Reconstruction in 1877. They referred to themselves “Radicals” because of their goal of immediate, complete, permanent annihilation of slavery, without compromise. They were opposed during the War by the moderate Republicans (led by U.S. President Abraham Lincoln), and by the pro-slavery and anti-Reconstruction Democratic Party as well as liberals in the Northern United States during Reconstruction. Radicals led efforts after the war to establish civil rights for former slaves and fully implement emancipation

Once you’ve done that, your transaction will be broadcast to the network. Someone else will come along, choose your transaction in the tip selection process and validate it. And just like that, transaction is confirmed.
• It’s quite easy to determine the confirmation level of your transaction: it executes the MCMC algorithm N times, the probability of transaction being accepted is therefore M of N.
• As a merchant, in IOTA you have complete freedom to decide with what probability you will start accepting transactions. If you are happy with 51% transaction you can increase the threshold to 99 or 100.

How does IOTA prevent double spending

• In the tangle, transactions are atomic. During processing though, bundles are.
• When a full node is asked to provide tips to a light node to create a transaction, the full node will walk backwards along the edges of the DAG to the general transaction and check if there are any conflicting transactions along the way. If there is then that tip is discarded. If there isn’t then the tip is considered valid.
• An attacker would have to outpace the input flow of new transactions. The tangle is network bound – requiring an attacker to be everywhere at the same time.
• So full nodes are constantly being asked to provide branch and trunk tips to the light nodes for bundling purposes and will only select tips free of conflict. The attacker will try and do the same with the double spend and has to find a way to overwhelm the entire network’s influx.
• There is no global consistency in the tangle. There is only eventual consistency.
• Stuck transactions are called orphans. They can be grouped together in subtangles.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.