How the Courts Address or Respect Our Rights as Citizens

 

How the Courts Address or Respect Our Rights as Citizens – Presentation
• Using a narrated power point Use the speaker notes to elaborate on the content on the slides.
The presentation Point presentation will need to include:
• Name the case: PLESSY v. FERGUSON , 163 U.S. 537 (1896)
• Discuss the facts of the case.
• Discuss the history of the case (what laws or legal action was taken)
• Discuss the issues or the facts of the case and legal questions the court must decide.
• Discuss if the court’s decision or holdings was for the plaintiff or for the defendant and what were the reasons for the decision?
• Discuss the concurring and dissenting opinions from the judge or if a jury trial, the jury.
Important: In this assignment, you are expected to elaborate on the points you made on part I of How the courts address or respect our rights as citizens.

Sample Solution

How the Courts Address or Respect Our Rights as Citizens: A Look at Plessy v. Ferguson

Slide 1: Title Slide

  • Title: Plessy v. Ferguson: A Landmark Case on Racial Segregation
  • Subtitle: How the Courts Address or Respect Our Rights as Citizens
  • Presenter Name and Affiliation

Slide 2: Introduction

  • Briefly introduce the presentation topic: How the courts address or respect our rights as citizens.
  • Highlight the importance of understanding landmark cases like Plessy v. Ferguson in this context.

Slide 3: Facts of the Case

  • Date: 1896
  • Location: Louisiana
  • Plaintiff: Homer Plessy, an African American man
  • Defendant: John H. Ferguson, judge of the New Orleans Criminal Court
  • Underlying Law: Louisiana Separate Car Act of 1890, requiring segregation on passenger trains.

Slide 4: History of the Case

  • Background: Reconstruction Era and the Jim Crow South
  • Plessy’s Actions: Purchased a first-class train ticket and intentionally sat in the “whites only” car.
  • Arrest and Trial: Arrested for violating the Separate Car Act, convicted and fined.

Slide 5: Issues and Legal Questions

  • Primary Issue: Whether the Louisiana Separate Car Act violated the Fourteenth Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause.
  • Legal Questions:
    • Does the Fourteenth Amendment guarantee racial equality in public accommodations?
    • Can the government enforce racial segregation through laws like the Separate Car Act?
    • What constitutes “equal” under the Equal Protection Clause?

Slide 6: Court’s Decision and Reasoning

  • Decision: 7-1 in favor of Ferguson (upholding the Separate Car Act).
  • Reasoning:
    • “Separate but equal” facilities were deemed constitutional.
    • Segregation did not constitute discrimination as long as facilities were equal.
    • Court emphasized the need for social order and state’s rights.

Slide 7: Concurring and Dissenting Opinions

  • Justice Harlan’s Dissent:
    • Strongly argued that the Separate Car Act violated the Fourteenth Amendment.
    • Stated that segregation was inherently unequal and perpetuated racial prejudice.

Slide 8: Impact and Legacy of the Case

  • Immediate Impact:
    • Legitimized racial segregation and Jim Crow laws.
    • Emboldened discriminatory practices across the South.
  • Long-Term Impact:
    • Fueled the Civil Rights Movement and the fight for racial equality.
    • Inspired landmark cases like Brown v. Board of Education (1954), which overturned Plessy.

Slide 9: Reflection and Discussion

  • Discuss the historical context of the case and its relevance today.
  • Analyze the court’s reasoning and its flaws in light of the Fourteenth Amendment.
  • Explore the impact of dissent on the legal process and society.
  • Consider the limitations of the “separate but equal” doctrine.

Slide 10: Conclusion

  • Summarize the key points of the case and its significance.
  • Emphasize the importance of understanding how courts address or respect our rights as citizens.
  • Encourage critical thinking and engagement with landmark cases like Plessy v. Ferguson.

Speaker Notes:

  • Provide additional details and historical context not included in the slides.
  • Offer personal insights and interpretations of the case and its impact.
  • Encourage audience engagement through questions and discussion.
  • Use clear and concise language, avoiding legal jargon.
  • Emphasize the importance of the Fourteenth Amendment and its role in protecting individual rights.
  • Connect the case to broader themes of equality, justice, and the ongoing struggle for civil rights.

 

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.