How the EEOC uses job analysis to settle employee-employer disputes.

Job analysis is and should be the basis for all Industrial and Organizational Psychology interventions. Often we find support for our work in job analysis from legal challenges to decisions made about job candidates and employees. For this week’s discussion, visit the EEOC website and find a current or previous case in which the job analysis was essential to the outcome or filing of the lawsuit. Briefly describe the situation of the EEOC case, the role job analysis played in the case, and the outcome of the case. What could have been done differently to avoid the negative outcome to the organization?

 

Sample Solution

How the EEOC uses job analysis to settle employee-employer disputes

The equal employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) enforces the statutes that prohibit workplace discrimination in the federal government, including Section 717 of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the regulations that are codified in the Code of Federal Regulations at 29 C.F.R. 1614, and relevant guidance including the EEOC Management Directive 110 (MS-110) (complaint processing manual). EEOC recommends the use of the Memorandums of Understanding (MOU). The MD-110 states that agencies should have formal, or informal, arrangements with other agencies, or third parties, to process their conflict cases.

bombing drops. President Truman and Stimson had also agreed that if the Soviet Union had asked about atomic weapons in the upcoming meetings, Truman would stall. Truman would also mention at the meeting in Potsdam that the United States were preparing to use a new weapon against Japan.

General Lesile Groves and Thomas Farrell were responsible for the bomb target selection group. They grouped scientists and Army Air Force Officers to determine the location of the bombing. It all came down to Kokura Arsenal, Kyoto, Niigata, and Hiroshima for the bombing locations. The group believed that dropping the bomb on one of these cities would make a psychological impact on the Japanese and weaken military forces.

Kyoto was seen as an ideal location by others because many industries were relocated and some of Japan’s major factories were in Kyoto. But, Stimson had rejected the idea of Kyoto being the place where the bomb dropped because Kyoto was a cultural importance to Japan. Intially, Kokura was chosen as a target but because of the clouds and smoke from a firebomb in Yahata making their way over to Kokura, pilot Charles W. Sweeney moved to Nagasaki.

Niigata was ruled out because of it’s distance from the other targets. Niigata was 440 miles away from Hiroshima while the other targets (Kyoto, Kokura, and Nagasaki) were 100 miles away. Flying a B-29 and carrying a 5 ton bomb was already enough work. Hiroshima was finally chosen. Putting a bomb in the middle of Hiroshima would destroy the entirety of the city. Hiroshima was chosen also because of it’s factories and facilities.

After 6:00 a.m, the atomic bomb was fully secured and armed. At 7:00 a.m, the Japanese radar detected one of the three planes that hovered over Hiroshima on the same day as the bombing and informed Hiroshima citizens. The plane had circled around Hiroshima but there were no signs of bombers so citizens quickly dismissed it and started their daily work. By 7:25, Enola Gay was finally cruising over Hiroshima. Enola Gay was 26,000 feet above ground and by 8:00 a.m, the Japanese radar had detected something again. It was the B-29 bomb heading towards Hiroshima. Radio stations were alerted and casted a warning for peo

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.