Sample Solution

The author of the essay “How We Killed Expertise (and Why We Need it Back)” is Matt Peterson, a Fellow at New America and Senior Editor of The Atlantic. It was published in September 2017 on Politico Magazine.

The intended audience for this essay appears to be those interested in public policy – as its main argument is that relying too heavily on technology has caused us to overlook experts’ opinions which are often necessary for informed decision-making. To back up these claims, the author cites examples from history and uses his own experiences working with government officials to show how we’ve been moving away from expertise over time (Peterson, 2017).

In terms of effectiveness– I believe this essay meets its goal as it clearly outlines why expertise is so important when making complex decisions and does so in an engaging way. That being said however – there are some areas where it could be improved upon such as expanding upon the section discussing historical events because those stories provide valuable context for understanding our current situation.

Additionally– although much of the evidence used by Peterson can be considered credible due their sources or personal anecdotes , his opinion should still be subjected to further scrutiny since he didn’t cite any research studies conducted specifically on this topic . Fortunately though– he references certain scientific papers throughout the piece which makes his article more trustworthy than if there were no external materials cited at all.

Overall then, “How We Killed Expertise (and Why We Need it Back)” presents a convincing argument about why citizens need access to experts in order form better policies through an entertaining narrative with credible sources cited throughout. Nevertheless– if additional research was included then readers would have even greater confidence in its validity.