Human Cloning Acceptable

Sample Solution

The debate over whether or not human cloning is acceptable is one that has been ongoing for many years. While some argue that it can be a valuable medical advancement, others are concerned about the ethical implications of such a procedure. When considering this issue, both sides need to be taken into account in order to make an informed decision. Supporters of human cloning argue that it could offer a potential solution for infertility and diseases like cancer and diabetes (Barton 2018). Through the use of embryonic stem cells obtained from cloned embryos, scientists are able to create therapies and treatments that may provide hope for patients who have had limited options until now (Caulfield 2009). In addition, they point out the potential benefits to society as well including increasing genetic diversity, creating organs suitable for transplantation, and allowing people with disabilities greater autonomy through artificial body parts (Castillo 2017). However, opponents caution against this new technology due primarily to moral concerns surrounding its use on humans. They worry about how clones would fit within our existing social structure as well as what their rights should be in terms of their own identity and autonomy (Hemmati 2020). Furthermore, there are questions regarding safety since any failure in the process could lead to serious health problems or even death (Seipel 2012). In conclusion, there are both pros and cons when it comes to human cloning which must be taken into consideration before making a decision on its acceptability. While it does present some potential medical advancements that could benefit society overall, there are also important ethical considerations related to using such technology on humans which should not be overlooked.

In 1991, the Bank of Credit and Commerce International was closed and led a substantial debate over the auditing function in banks. The official report on the closure was more inclined to a direct reporting of auditors to the senior bank management instead of the actual audit process and their reasoning was that information should be accessed by senior experts with the technical knowledge only. It highlighted the expectation gap between how the company sees itself through the lens of their knowledge and how financial auditors are recognized for their expertise in fraud detection.

Social Work

1) In 1992 a voluntary scheme was introduced as a regulation by the name – EC Environmental Management and Audit (EMA) scheme in UK. It was introduced to validate a restricted statement for support in terms of legal compliance, cost management and reworked efficient systems. The contribution of said system was imprecise on how it would empower public sector or public in general. Government however, decided to withdraw it before it was introduced due to the uncertainties which were clearly highlighting the statistics of contaminated land. The transparency of this report could have affected the government plans and therefore was removed from public scrutiny to hide the details that could have landed the government in problems. 2) In child care, the unambiguity with establishing defined standards is still under construction. Therefore, it is natural to focus on efficient cost cutting and basic parameters that are mutual to industrial standard setting instead of narrowing down to an improved rapport between outputs and inputs in terms of productivity.

NHS

England in 2001 introduced an annual ‘star rating’ system for the public health care institutions. As a result, managers in health care were prone to being fired if the results reflected poor performance when measured and were subjected to ‘naming and shaming’ for poor performance (Anonymous 2001).