Write essay on Impact of deforestation of a rainforest or other forest of your choice to the planet’s atmosphere and wildlife
How we know for a FACT that the theory of climate change or the disruption of your
selected topic are indeed human caused/driven
○
What evidence is there to support this
●
How this issue impact affects wildlife, ecosystems, atmosphere, and any other non-
Impact of deforestation of a rainforest or other forest of your choice to the planet`s atmosphere and wildlife
Rainforests around the world still continue to fall. Does it really matter? Why should anyone care if some plants, animals, mushroom, and microorganism perish? Rainforests are often hot and humid, difficult to reach, insect-ridden, and have elusive wildlife. Actually the concern should not be about losing a few plants and animals; mankind stands to lose much more. By destroying the tropical forests, we risk our own quality of life, gamble with the stability of climate and local weather, threaten the existence of other species, and undermine the valuable services provided by biological diversity. The current warming trend is of particular significance because most of it is extremely likely to be the result of human activity since the mid-20th century. The heat-trapping nature of carbon dioxide and other gases was demonstrated in the mid-19th century (Joseph Fourier, 1824, John Tyndall, 1860s).
Free trade is a trade where countries carries out economic activities ‘without restrictions or barrier such as import and export tariffs’, barrier to market entry and policies (Johnston, Gregory, & Smith, 2011, free trade). Many countries have reaped benefits from free trade and especially developing countries. Some benefits include improvement in infrastructures, expanded markets, access to technologies, free movement of labour and capital, investment, and political relations in form of integrations. These benefits have played a major role in the economic developments of developing countries. However, some countries argue against free trade claiming that it is a burden to developing countries and they object it. Some arguments against include exploitation of developing countries by industrialised, environmental pollution, unemployment of domestic workers, and underperformance of domestic industries thus affecting the country’s economic growth. Free trade has positively impacted to developing countries by stimulating their economic development goals such as millennium development goals thus it can be said to be realistic in the real world.
Free trade was found to work out for countries such as Japan, South Korea, China, other East Asia countries, and most of the developed countries in the world. Trade liberalization led to development of these countries and to attainment of their current level of ‘developed countries’ in the world. The countries formed ‘free trade and economic partnership agreements that helped in negotiations of trade across borders was important in facilitating trade,’ technical support, services, environmental and social issues (Zeng, 2010 p. 651). The guidelines helped countries to carry out trade in a defined environment that prevented them from exploiting each other in terms of natural resources. As a result, the countries realised developments. This has also worked out for developing countries such as those in sub-Sahara Africa for example Egypt. Moreover, free trade agreements encourage foreign direct investments in developing countries increasing inward revenues to these countries. The increased revenues to these countries are channelled to development projects such infrastructures and improving social amenities to citizens. In addition, foreign direct investments create employment for domestic workers thus helping developing countries to lower their unemployment rates. This is one of the achievements that have contributed greatly to shifting of