Impact of the two types of methodologies

 

Discuss the impact of the two types of methodologies on the study. In your opinion, why did the researchers choose to use both qualitative and quantitative research? What are the benefits of using both? What are the drawbacks of using both? Explain your reasoning.

Sample Solution

Mixed methods research is the collection and analysis of both qualitative and quantitative data and its integration, drawing on the strengths of both approaches. Using a combination of qualitative and quantitative data can improve an evaluation by ensuring that the limitations of one type of data are balanced by the strengths of another. This will ensure that understanding is improved by integrating different ways of knowing. The drawbacks include: studies are not easily replicable or generalizable to the general population; conscious and unconscious bias can influence the researcher`s conclusions; and lacking rigorous scientific controls and numerical data, qualitative findings may be dismissed by some researchers as anecdotal information.

the individuals who don’t commit their opportunity to shielding creatures, caring alone isn’t adequate when we think about the bull’s destiny. Eventually the bull will pass on a ridiculous and delayed demise, in a boisterous bullring with individuals cheering, booing, applauding and a bullfighter puncturing cutting edges into its back. For the majority, the occasions of the bullfight offset the consideration the bull might get ahead of time. An inquiry that one could present is, might a human want to imagine the bull’s perspective? On the off chance that the consideration it gets can be utilized as a support and guard of compassionate treatment, why should an individual be reluctant to go through a similar destiny?

Once more – utilizing the case of people – really focusing on a youthful human as it grows up to guarantee it carries on with the most ideal life is normal. It isn’t finished with a ulterior intention that prompts an organized killing saw by hundreds or thousands of individuals. Basic entitlements activists accept the equivalent ought to be applied to creatures and for this situation bulls. This is a comparative contention utilized by Peter Singer in what he characterizes as equivalent thought of interests. This is the idea that affliction and agony shouldn’t rely upon “the species that encounters it”. All things considered, indistinguishable interests ought to be given equivalent weight, paying little heed to species. Utilizing this thinking, bullfighting couldn’t be considered moral or on the grounds that the bull experiences in a manner that wouldn’t be acknowledged whether it were a person.

During the 1970s Richard D Ryder authored the term speciesism, characterized in the OED as, “the supposition of human prevalence driving over the abuse of creatures”. Peter Singer likewise involved this term in his 1975 book, Animal Liberation, anticipating that later on people will glance back at their treatment of non-human creatures similarly that we today view the despicable and treacherous treatment of Africans utilized as slaves. Involving this contention for bullfighting in Spain, someone could contend that this will likewise be the situation with bullfighting. Later on, Spaniards could glance back, at a once conventional blood sport, with sensations of disgrace and responsibility.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.