Implicit Bias

 

 

 

An integral part to becoming a successful writer is learning how to hone our critical thinking skills. Whenever we encounter any piece of writing, we should question each and every aspect of it. However, what can be even more challenging is turning the critical gaze inward so that we can examine the ways in which we often make hasty generalizations about other people and ideas.
One way that we can do this is through examining something called “implicit bias.” Watch the PBS video entitled “Implicit Bias: Peanut Butter, Jelly and Racism” and respond to the questions below in order to help you explore this sometimes-insidious (but very common) concept.
Based on information presented in the video, how would you define implicit bias? How does the analogy of peanut butter and jelly help us to better understand exactly what implicit bias is and how it works?
What are some of the influences or experiences in our lives that might cause us to create implicit biases about groups of people, places, etc.?
Aside from the example provided in the video (that media often associates black men with violent crime), can you think of another unfair or biased association created through experiences, media, or any other influences?
Explain the difference that the video makes between having implicit bias and being racist. Why do you think that this distinction is important to understand when exploring implicit bias? In other words, what could be the danger of confusing racism and implicit bias?
Finally, what is the “blind spot bias”? How do you think that people could work to combat both the blind spot and implicit biases? As always, provide concrete examples. VIDEO BELOW

 

 

 

Sample Solution

regards to the osmosis of pieces into lumps. Mill operator recognizes pieces and lumps of data, the differentiation being that a piece is comprised of various pieces of data. It is fascinating to take note of that while there is a limited ability to recall lumps of data, how much pieces in every one of those lumps can change broadly (Miller, 1956). Anyway it’s anything but a straightforward instance of having the memorable option huge pieces right away, somewhat that as each piece turns out to be more natural, it very well may be acclimatized into a lump, which is then recollected itself. Recoding is the interaction by which individual pieces are ‘recoded’ and allocated to lumps. Consequently the ends that can be drawn from Miller’s unique work is that, while there is an acknowledged breaking point to the quantity of pieces of data that can be put away in prompt (present moment) memory, how much data inside every one of those lumps can be very high, without unfavorably influencing the review of similar number

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.