First, create a list of what you feel are important qualities for leadership. Remember, not all leaders look alike. For example, in some professions, you may need to be commanding, while in others you may need to be nurturing to succeed. Identify the traits or values of successful leaders in the career you are currently working in or wish to enter. You should evaluate at least five traits.
Next, analyze yourself according to each of those traits. Examine your strengths and weaknesses in each area.
Finally, reflect on what feel you need to do to strengthen your skills.
This is a partial list of traits and qualities; however, it should only be used as a reference. Make your list personal.
Initiative
Vision
Respect
Team Builder
Achieving
Good communicator
Public speaker
Advocate
Confident
Good listener
Role model
Teacher
Mentor
Creative
Drive
Desire to Lead
Good judgment
Knowledge
High energy
Sense of urgency
Proactive
Thinks win-win
Humility
Reality based
Instincts
Ethical behavior
Courageous
Common sense
Charisma
You must write at least three full pages, in APA format. Include at least three references in the body of the paper and include a reference page with your sources, and the following:
identify at least five traits of leaders in your profession (or the profession in which you want to be employed)
analyze your success with each of the traits
describe what you plan to do to achieve those traits if you are not skilled at each
pression and anxiety. In fact, the authors found avoidant styles of coping to be a strong indicator of posttraumatic stress symptoms. Despite participant use of harmful styles of coping, appropriate use of family/social support buffered the symptoms of depression and anxiety (Romero et al., 2015). The article included confusing and unnecessary hypothesized path models and was difficult to read. The authors discovered family and social support to be an effective bulwark at preventing psychological distress in student veterans. Avoidant coping strategies were discovered to be a hindrance to maintaining mental health. The importance of appropriate and effective coping strategies was highlighted to promote mental health and prevent psychological distress; however, the importance of familial/social support should not be discounted.
Schwarzer, Bowler & Cone (2014) examined New York police officers after the September 11th terrorist attack on the World Trade Center. The Level IV longitudinal review analyzed the mental health of police officers who responded to the 9/11 attack and destruction repairs. The sample included 2943 police officers who participated in a minimum of one shift from the day of the terrorist attack to the last day of repairs, on June 30th, 2002. The officers completed two questionnaires to assess stress response symptoms to determine possible posttraumatic stress disorders [PTSD]. The PTSD specific stressor questionnaire combined with exposure level assessments and social integration measurements determined the mental health outcomes. The articles discussed the two-step process interchangeably, however, the rest of the study was concise and logically organized. The authors discovered an association between high levels of exposure with an increase in stress levels however social integration diminished the effect (Schwarzer et al., 2014). Human beings are social creatures who thrive on social interactions; the study performed by Schwarzer et al. (2014) accentuated the positive effects social interaction has on diminishing the negative psychological impact caused by traumatic events.
Zawadzki (2015) reviewed the association between rumination and poor psychological health. The meta-analysis was conducted to understand the connection between rumination, strategies used by individuals seeking help for psychological distress in the ER, and psychological health risk indicators. The relationship between the topics were reviewed to determine possible independent relationships with psychological health. The sample consis