Individual Right Versus the Collective Good

Most of the recent successes in improving the public’4 s health have had to address the tension of individual rights versus the collective good. Anti-smoking campaigns and laws banning smoking in public places protect people from the negative health effects of second-hand smoke, yet some believe that they infringe on the individual rights of those who choose to smoke. Requiring childhood immunizations has helped prevent diseases such as polio and measles, but some parents assert that they have the right to decide if being immunized is in the best interest of their children.

This tension also exists in the allocation of scarce resources, from providing adequate staff coverage to making decisions about the amount of health care to provide. Given the nurse’s involvement in policy and health care delivery, it is important to understand the dynamics of this tension, as well as the legal and ethical implications.

When have you encountered a tension between the individual right and the collective good in your nursing practice?
With information from the Learning Resources in mind, consider relatively recent examples of health care policy that demonstrate this tension. For this Discussion, select one example of timely health care policy that allows you to evaluate the tension between individual rights and the collective good. Conduct additional research as necessary using credible websites and the Walden Library.
By Day 3
Post a cohesive response that addresses the following:

In the first line of your posting, identify a health care policy.
Explain the tension between individual rights and the collective good.
Analyze the ethical and legal considerations of the policy.

Sample Solution

Three-dimensional facial recreation is finished by models or high goals, three-dimensional pictures. PC programs can make facial reproductions by controlling examined photos of the remaining parts and use approximations to reproduce facial highlights. These will in general produce results that don’t look fake (Reichs and Craig 491).

Once in a while, specialists will utilize a strategy called superimposition as a procedure for facial reproduction. Shockingly, it’s anything but a usually utilized technique, as it expects examiners to have some information about the personality of the remaining parts they are managing. By superimposing a photo of a person over the skeletal remains, specialists can check whether the facial highlights line up with the anatomical highlights, permitting them to distinguish a casualty.

On account of John Wayne Gacy’s casualties, specialists had the option to utilize facial remaking to recognize nine of the bodies found in the slither space. The accompanying realistic shows the facial recreations of these nine casualties:

Since facial recreation was insufficient to distinguish the entirety of the people in question, examiners got DNA profiles from every one of the unidentified casualties and effectively searched out DNA tests from guys over the United States who had been accounted for missing somewhere in the range of 1970 and 1979 (Cook County Sheriff’s Office 3).

The rest of the casualties were distinguished utilizing dental and radiology records.

Since dental polish is harder than bone, teeth outlive tissue and once in a while bone when the body breaks down. Teeth are truly dependable in recognizing casualties, as they will in general uncover propensities

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.