cpcpcpcp
  • Home
  • Services
    • Essay Services
      • Term Paper
      • Research Paper
      • Book Report/Review, Movie Review
      • Case Study
      • Coursework
      • Speech/Presentation
      • Lab Report
      • Article
      • Article Critique
      • Annotated Bibliography
      • Reaction Paper
    • Dissertation & Thesis Services
      • Dissertation
      • Thesis/Dissertation Proposal
      • Any dissertation chapter
      • Thesis
      • Research Proposal
      • Proofreading
      • Editing
    • Assignments
      • Online Assignments
      • Programming
      • Power Point Presentation
      • Statistics Project
      • Math/Physics/Economics/Statistics Problems
      • Multiple Choice Questions
      • Research Summary
      • Multimedia Project
      • Mind Mapping
      • Simulation
    • Admission Services
      • Admission Essay
      • Scholarship Essay
      • Personal Statement
      • Editing
    • Resume Services
      • Resume Writing
      • Resume Editing
      • CV Writing
      • CV Editing
      • Cover Letter
    • Editing Services
      • Editing
      • Proofreading
      • Formatting
  • Guarantees
  • Reviews
  • About Us
  • FAQs
  • Sample Papers
  • Contact Us
  • Sign Up
  • Sign In
  • USA: +1 917 810 5386
  • info@compliantpapers.com
Place Order Now

Innocence Is Irrelevant

Published by admin at January 23, 2023
Categories
  • Criminal Justice
Tags
  • “Innocence Is Irrelevant”

 

In the article “Innocence Is Irrelevant” from the September 2017 issue of The Atlantic, Emily Yoffee wrote:
Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy acknowledged this reality in 2012, writing for the majority in Missouri v. Frye, a case that helped establish the right to competent counsel for defendants who are offered a plea bargain. Quoting a law-review article, Kennedy wrote, ‘Horse trading [between prosecutor and defense counsel] determines who goes to jail and for how long. That is what plea bargaining is. It is not some adjunct to the criminal justice system; it is the criminal justice system.’
As prosecutors have accumulated power in recent decades, judges and public defenders have lost it. To induce defendants to plead, prosecutors often threaten ‘the trial penalty’: They make it known that defendants will face more-serious charges and harsher sentences if they take their case to court and are convicted. About 80 percent of defendants are eligible for court-appointed attorneys, including overworked public defenders who don’t have the time or resources to even consider bringing more than a tiny fraction of these cases to trial. The result, one frustrated Missouri public defender complained a decade ago, is a style of defense that is nothing more than “meet ’em and greet ’em and plead ’em.”
“Our system makes it a rational choice to plead guilty to something you didn’t do,” Maddy deLone, the executive director of the Innocence Project, told me [author Emily Yoffee].
Take a position. Is plea bargaining an effective or ineffective alternative process?
First, title your post either “Plea Bargaining Is an Effective Alternative Process” or “Plea Bargaining is Not an Effective Alternative Process.”
Then, using the information gained in this module and the resources noted above, make your case. Based upon the volume of court cases, the societal implications, and the impact that plea bargaining has on the defendant, do you believe that plea bargaining represents justice? Why or why not? Be sure to build your case with factual resources.
In your response to your peers, consider how well they justified their position, making use of available resources. Consider the following questions in your response posts:
Did they support their position convincingly using appropriate resources?
Which of their points make the most sense to you, even if you made a case for the opposing viewpoint?
https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2017/09/innocence-is-irrelevant/534171/

Sample Solution

I take the position that plea bargaining is an ineffective alternative process. This is evidenced by the fact that nearly 80% of criminal cases are resolved through plea bargaining and prosecutors have accumulated power in recent decades, resulting in defendants facing more serious charges and harsher sentences if they go to trial (Yoffee). This has led to a “meet ‘em and greet ‘em and plead ‘em” style of defense which allows innocent people to be coerced into accepting guilty pleas just so they can avoid facing the possibility of longer jail time if found guilty by a court (Yoffee).

Furthermore, as Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy acknowledged in his majority opinion for Missouri v. Frye, this type of horse trading between prosecutors and defense attorneys means that those without substantial resources or legal knowledge cannot afford to risk taking their cases to trial (Yoffee). The lack of fairness inherent in this system puts innocent people at risk of being wrongfully convicted, simply because they do not have access to competent counsel who could challenge the prosecution’s case against them.

Finally, even when it does result in a conviction based on a guilty plea, there is no guarantee that justice will be served. As Maddy deLone from the Innocence Project pointed out, our current system makes it a rational choice for someone to plead guilty even if they are truly innocent (Yoffee). All too often this leads to individuals serving time for crimes they never committed – something which would certainly not happen if our justice system was focused on providing equitable outcomes instead of encouraging quick resolution through plea bargaining.

Overall then, while plea bargaining may appear like an efficient way to process criminal cases quickly, its efficacy is limited due to its lack of fairness. Without significant reforms or alternatives which prioritize justice over speediness – such as abolishing mandatory minimums – we run the risk of allowing those with limited resources or legal knowledge fall victim to unfair convictions.

regards to the osmosis of pieces into lumps. Mill operator recognizes pieces and lumps of data, the differentiation being that a piece is comprised of various pieces of data. It is fascinating regards to the osmosis of pieces into lumps. Mill operator recognizes pieces and lumps of data, the differentiation being that a piece is comprised of various pieces of data. It is fascinating to take note of that while there is a limited ability to recall lumps of data, how much pieces in every one of those lumps can change broadly (Miller, 1956). Anyway it’s anything but a straightforward instance of having the memorable option huge pieces right away, somewhat that as each piece turns out to be more natural, it very well may be acclimatized into a lump, which is then recollected itself. Recoding is the interaction by which individual pieces are ‘recoded’ and allocated to lumps. Consequently the ends that can be drawn from Miller’s unique work is that, while there is an acknowledged breaking point to the quantity of pi

This question has been answered.

Get Answer

Testimonials

Awesome Writers

When I ordered my paper, even me i couldn’t understand some of the things the professor needed. My writer first tutored me to ensure we were on the same page, and proceeded to deliver a masterpiece. It was too good to be true. I still use this site hitherto.

McCarty
Wiley

What a Gem!

I was stuck with my MSN final project, and almost dropped the course, until a dear friend shared with me the link to this amazing website. The help i recieved, man – I still feel that I didn’t pay enough. I had to gift my writer with an iPhone. I was just too happy!

Lorie
Nurse

This is good

I used compliantpapers.com for my online test, and they scored 9/10, and I was so amazed. I didn’t know such service even existed. In my second paper, all was good apart from a few grammar errors which I handled myself. Otherwise, all good!

Ken
Kentucky

I recommend!

My paper was delivered in time, and for my first time, I was given a crazy welcome discount. From thence, I have been in love with these guys. Thank you for your help!

Audrey, Birmingham

Complaintpapers.com, simply the best

Awesome, awesome, awesome! Paper delivered on time, perfect quality, great customer service, and above all, they made our relationship so personal, especially Brian, the supervisor. So concerned and a great guy. I recommend to anyone looking for a peace of mind!

Shaunda Whitney, Australia

It couldn’t be better

I must confess that I have wandered off to many sites claiming to be legit, but I have been conned, or given sh**y quality papers. Once I found Complaintpapers.com, I have never looked elsewhere. The service is great, the writers are friendly, and revisions are unlimited. I can go all the way to my PhD, now that i have a worthy partner!

Bryant
Douche Wear

Thank you

Thank you for your support on this order. I will be loyal costumer to you

Marius Bildea B

Great service in the past. Future looks great.

Great service in the past. Future looks great.
Thank you for all essays received.

Digne

Reliable and trustworthy

Reliable and trustworthy. Perfect place to come to when you need help.

John Williams
Previous Slide
Next Slide

Writing Services We Offer

☑ Admission Services
☑ Dissertation Services
☑ Assignments
☑ Editing Services
☑ Online Media ProductsNEW!
☑ Thesis Services
☑ Essays Writing Services
☑ Resume Services

Place Order Now

We accept various forms of payment, such as:

Compliant Papers   

Services

  • Essay Writing Service
  • Coursework Writing Service
  • Report Writing
  • Dissertation Writing Service
  • Assignment Writing Service

Contact centre

Phone: USA: +1 917 810 5386, UK: +44 3286 1801
Skype: Superioressays
Whatsapp: +1 (917) 810-5386
Email us: info@compliantpapers.com / support@compliantpapers.com

© 2025 COMPLIANT PAPERS. All Rights Reserved.

      WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
      Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
      👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.
      Hi, how can I help?