Integrated Case Project

 

Wanda and Bill Murry have come to you seeking professional financial advice.
• They are married with twins
o The twins are both 12 years of age.
o Wanda is 48 years old.
o Bill is 49.
• Wanda is a physician with her own practice.
o She has 5 other employees that work for her, all of whom are either assistants, nurses
or admin.
o The business revenues are $2,000,000.
o She pays herself a salary of $750,000.
o The business has a profit at the end of the year of $500,000.
o She has never installed a retirement plan for her employees.
• Bill is an engineer and works for an engineering company that he does not own.
o His gross salary is $200,000.
o His employer has a 401(k) plan plus profit sharing.
 The 401(k) plan has both a before tax contribution option as well as a Roth
401(k) contribution option.
 He contributes 10% of his gross salary to the before tax option of the 401(k)
plan.
 His employer matches him with 5% of his pay
 Profit sharing contributions paid by his employer add an additional $20,000 to
his 401(k) plan.
 His current balance in the plan is $3,000,000.
• Cash Flow and taxes
o Given their incomes, they pay a significant amount of federal taxes each year (ignore
state taxes for this exercise)

Sample Solution

Despite the fact that tax assessment has its reasonable advantages, it’s anything but an ideal mediation to address the unmistakable market disappointment that is happening. Initially, the versatility of interest for red meat should be considered. In the event that the interest for red meat is profoundly inelastic, it will deliver the duty futile in light of the fact that the slight expansion in the cost of red meats will significantly affect interest. In a 2011study it was assessed that the uncompensated cost flexibilities for hamburger and pork (famous red meats) in 2009 was – 0.594 and – 0.779 separately, meaning they are both cost inelastic (Tiffin et al 2011). Consequently the assessment is probably going to affect utilization since customers will in any case purchase red meats like hamburger and pork notwithstanding the ascent in cost.

As found in Figure 2, in the outline on the right, we see a decent with a cost inelastic interest, for example, is the situation for meat and pork. At the point when an assessment is carried out on supply from S1 to S + charge the fall in amount from Q1 to Q2 is substantially less critical than that in the chart on the left. In this manner the public authority can’t rest assured how powerful the assessment is probably going to be.

One more issue with tax assessment as a type of government mediation is that there might be trouble setting the right worth of the duty. Assuming the financial worth of the negative externality of red meat utilization is difficult to gauge then it could be set excessively high or low. For instance, on the off chance that the duty rate is set too low, the assessment will be insufficient particularly when combined with the way that most red meats have a cost inelastic requests. Purchasers will be undeterred by the expense yet purchase red meat as they regularly would. Nonetheless, on the off chance that the assessment is set too high, this makes a motivating force for purchasers to try not to pay the expense through means, for example, “smuggling”. This won’t be great for the public authority and they are probably going to need to execute rigid guidelines to stop this

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.