Interactionist, consensus, conflict

 

 

 

1. Discuss the different views (I.e., interactionist, consensus, conflict) that influence how crime is defined. Which do you think is the best definition and why? Your “why” should be supported with facts.
2. Discuss two strengths and two weaknesses of each of the various measures of crime. Which method do you think is best and why?
3. Discuss two ways in which you think we can lessen the dark figure of crime.
4. Based on your answers to questions 1-3, propose a new way in which you think crime data should be collected. * note- this question involves critical thinking and should be your unique idea. You should, however, use course material to back up your thoughts.

 

Sample Solution

Interactionist, consensus, conflict

Crime is any activity publicly proscribed by the written laws of a society (McGuire, 2004, p. 3). However, crime is a complex issue, and that is why theorists have investigated the causes of the criminal act using different perspectives and explanations. There are three types of views on crime: the consensus view, the conflict view and the interactionist view. Each view takes has its own perspective on what crime is and how the law relates to crime. The interactionist view states that the definition of crime reflects the preferences and opinions of people who hold social power in a particular legal jurisdiction, such as the auto industry.

D and is recommended by NICE as a primary treatment (NICE, 2018). It is seen as a cognitive-behavioural treatment combined with aspects of exposure therapy (Boudewyns & Hyer, 1996) and it works by the participant recalling the traumatic events that they experienced whilst simultaneously having their attention directed to a physical bilateral stimulation they are receiving, such as hearing tones in alternating ears, moving eyes rapidly from side to side, or tapping sensations of either side of the body. Similarly to ET, this therapy works by allowing the mind to safely experience traumatic events, letting the mind process them fully in order to heal appropriately (Shapiro, 1996). A systematic narrative review was carried out on the effectiveness of EMDR for PTSD from four randomized control trials and two meta-analyses. It was found that the therapy was able to reduce the symptoms as well as symptoms that were trauma related, and also appeared more effective than other treatments for trauma as well as effective across different cultures. However, there was a consistent limitation which was the small sample sizes. It also did not take into account the amount of people who were withdrawn from the trials. Despite this, EMDR is shown to be able to reduce the symptoms of PTSD by treating the cause of the problem (Wilson, Farrell, Barron, Hutchins, Whybrow & Kiernan, 2018). This, in turn, leads to a lessening of symptoms.

Although the above mentioned therapies may be effective at treating the psychological damages, there is evidence to show that people who suffer with PTSD have physiological changes too. A meta-analysis studied brain regions of PTSD participants compared to controls and found that the hippocampus and left amygdala volumes as well as the anterior cingulate cortex were all significantly smaller compared to controls and trauma-exposed participants (Karl, Schaefer, Malta, Dorfel, Rohleder & Werner, 2006). Other studies have made observations that there are differences in grey matter volumes, hypothalamus, and even the prefrontal cortex between PTSD participants and controls (Flemingham et al, 2009). Multiple types of medication can be prescribed to alleviate the symptoms of PTSD, and these can include anti-depressants, anti-anxiety medication and anti-psychotics (Ipser & Stein, 2012), however the most commonly used in the U.K. as a treatment for PTSD are antidepressants (De Vries, De Jonge, van den Heuvel, Turner & Roest, 201

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.