Write a two-page analysis of the article related to International Comparison Program and purchasing power parities for construction analysis/discussion. You
must have a title page, abstract page, two full pages of text and a reference page.
This article, “The International Comparison Program and Purchasing Power Parities for Construction” by Lim et al (2015) examines the effects on construction activities and costs due to international comparison program (ICP) and purchasing power parities (PPPs).
The main focus of the article is on understanding how PPPs are used to analyze a country’s economic performance such as in terms of gross domestic product per capita. This article also looks at how PPPs can be utilized to compare levels of national construction activity across various nations. In particular, it looks at four countries: South Korea, Japan, France and Germany which had differing levels of development in their respective construction industries during this time period. The authors note that the cost data from these countries was converted into US dollars using ICP-derived PPPs in order to ensure comparability.
In addition, the authors discuss the implications of using ICP data versus conventional exchange rate methods for comparing prices across different countries. They assert that converting currency values through an exchange rate method may lead to inaccurate conclusions because it fails to take into account differences in price level between economies while PPPs directly measure relative price levels across nations more accurately. Furthermore, they discuss potential applications and limitations when utilizing ICP-derived PPPsets for comparisons such as not considering regional differences within individual countries or geographic region costs related to taxation or labor productivity.
Overall, this study demonstrates how understanding ICP and its application with regards to comparative analysis among construction activities plays an important role in making accurate international comparisons regarding GDP figures or in other research contexts focusing on analyzing cost patterns.
Capitalism results in economic growth because it feeds innovation through competition. China has developed an increasingly free market economy. The Soviet Union was innovative whenever they were involved in competing with the United States, but for products only distributed within their nation, it was always the bare minimum. The “invisible hand” of competition, brings the market to a natural equilibrium according to Adam Smith. Competition supports individual growth as well, and eventually results in more specializations of work.
An important distinction between capitalism and communism is the idea of equal opportunity verses equal outcome. Capitalism supports the idea of equal opportunity, but this automatically results in an unequal outcome because of the varying amounts in which different people are willing to work. Communism on the other hand supports the idea of equal outcome. There should be no wealth gaps in a communist state because it doesn’t matter how much work a person puts into succeeding, they end up with the same result. There is no competition, and there is no opportunity for growth.
China was primarily communist before for the majority of the 20th century, but they began transitioning into a mixed economy during the 90’s. They’ve experienced great economic growth due to this transition. In 1990, China’s GDP was 360.585 billion USD, and in 2011 12.238 trillion USD (China, 2017). The gross nominal income, GNI, per capita has also grown from 330 USD in 1990, to 8, 690 USD in 2017 (China, 2017). The new plan for China is to focus on innovation and becoming a leader in technological advances. “Made in China 2025” is a plan set out by Xi Jinping to change the Chinese economy to a mixed economy instead of a controlled economy (Amadeo, 2018). They are recognizing the relationship that innovation and competition have in furthering the economy. China’s plans to evolve into a mixed economy with more privatized markets will turn China into a more economically balanced nation.