International Macroeconomics

 

 

Consider a small open economy that lives for two periods, only, (t and t + 1; for
all purposes to some extent if it makes it easier you can think of this as t =
0 and t = 1) and is inhabited by a continuum of identical individuals grouped into an
aggregate risk-sharing household. Each period aggregate output Yt
is produced via the
function Yt = ZtLt where Zt
is exogenous productivity and Lt
is labor. If output is not
consumed or loaned out in any one period, then it spoils and cannot be carried over to
the following period (this just means that the economy cannot save internally, itís only way
to save would be to make international loans). This is a small open economy, so it can
borrow and lend freely at the constant-across-periods international interest rate r. The
householdís instantaneous utility is given by Ct=Lt and the household discounts the future
at rate , where: 2 (0; 1) is the householdís (constant) subjective discount factor (i.e.,
0 < < 1, where 2 means ìbelongsî and is the Greek letter ìbetaî); C is consumption;
L is labor. Moreover, the household ìownsî the production function, so its thinking with
regards to its maximization problem is akin to that of a benevolent social planner. Now,
consider the following version of the householdís intertemporal utility maximization problem,
where A denotes the (endogenous) state variable ì(internationally traded) assets.î The
household chooses consumption, labor, and assets to maximize lifetime utility (hint: this
involves Ps=t+1
s=t
, for all purposes, as noted earlier, to some extent if it makes it
easier you can broadly think of this as t = 0 and t = 1; the explicit changes just
involve setting up certain things using s instead of our usual t, but at the end of
the day things should look entirely familiar: trust me!) such that
Cs + As+1  (1 + r) As + ZsLs
Let s denote the time-s Lagrange multiplier.
1. (Worth 15 points.) State the householdís Lagrangian.
2. (Worth 35 points.) State the Örst order conditions for the householdís (that is, the
economyís) utility maximization problem using s = t.
3. (Worth 50 points.) Is the following claim true, false, or uncertain? When the
economy is open, if =
1
1+r
, then the solution to the householdís period-t intertemporal
1
utility maximization problem implies that Ct+1 =
Zt+1
Zt
Ct
. (Note: again, if it is
easier to think about this, you can just imagine that t = 0, in which case
the question is asking whether it is true C1 =
Z1
Z0
C0:) Justify your answer with
thorough mathematical detail. (Huge hint: There are three ways through which Ct+1,
Ct, Zt+1, and Zt can meet in this problem. The Örst way is really straightforward and
involves combining two FOCs. The second will be revealed by going through our “usual
thing” in the small open economy case, which is equating the slope of an indi§erence
curve with the slope of the lieftime budget constraint. Iím not saying that equating the
slope is the solution, Iím saying that in going through these steps youíll see the second
instance in which all of these variables meet. The last is a potential combination
between the Örst and second ways. Thatís it, you do those three things and they are
exhaustive to be able to answer the claim.)
2

 

 

Sample Solution

Richmond Beach was my otherworldly home base in my adolescence. It is a rough sea shore in the city of Richmond Beach, which can be gotten to by a long downhill drive (via vehicle or bike) from the city of Edmonds. Or on the other hand, as I did frequently, went for the 30-minute stroll from my home to the quiet waters through a peaceful walk around the forested areas of Woodway. It used to be a spot possessed by Native Americans, however now it is involved by for the most part Caucasian individuals. In any case, a chain of command remains in tribute to the clans that used to call the sea shore home. It has an immense property, with a sea shore, a play area, two upper gardens for the view and entertainment, bunch “mystery” trails along the earth slopes, excursion zones, and a square where individuals can stroll around, clean up after a dip, and seats for the dynamite see. With the sagebrush, jabbering feathered creatures, train tracks, the croak of frogs, wind, herons, different shells, a cavern along the sea shore, and an awesome perspective on the Olympic Mountains, Richmond Beach is on the double conventional and uncommon. Being there brings you into another state, in which you need to introspect, be quiet, and be certain. In secondary school, I was not a social individual. I didn’t have such a significant number of companions, and I didn’t feel like I had a place in a gathering more often than not. In any case, when I went to Richmond Beach, these stresses were deserted. It appeared to be a mysterious spot to me, and as it were, it despite everything does. I would stroll to different places on the sea shore: a mystery collapse the dirt slopes on the left, the train tracks that lead right from Seattle to Chicago, the mass of sagebrush where the song of feathered creatures made for a peaceful scene, and obviously the sea shore itself, which was dispersed with shells, tide pools, crabs, seals, driftwood, leftovers of gatherings, and that’s only the tip of the iceberg. The passing trains consistently pulled in me there also. My first word was “choo,” since the initial three years of my life was close to a train station in the Greenlake zone of Seattle. Thus, I had a calling towards trains since my introduction to the world. Strolling the tracks, I would meet intriguing individuals, figure out how to realize when trains were getting through the vibration and singing of the rails, and would be submerged in a world with a timberland on one side and the Puget Sound and the other. This blend of woods and sea was captivating, and caught my creative mind. I composed numerous sonnets about this spot, and have been ceaselessly roused by the air there. Truth be told, my verse has grown to a great extent at Richmond Beach. No what other place have I composed such a significant number of ballads—aside from maybe on open vehicle. I began composing expressive and story verse around 11 years old, and have proceeded since. For as long as barely any years, I have been composing only haiku. A great deal of my haiku is enlivened by the idea of Richmond Beach, how I identify with it profoundly, and by the individuals who used to possess that land—as I feel an uncommon association with Native Americans. It appears that Richmond Beach is one of those spots that regardless of how awful you believe, you will leave feeling alleviated and restored. It resembles treatment just to stroll around, feel the ionic breeze of the Puget Sound, smell the ocean growth and dampness, hear the assortment of winged animals singing, tune in to the smashing of moderate waves, witness the boats and different vessels on the water, take in the Olympic mountains in the entirety of their wonder, see individuals having fun on the sea shore, the whistle and trucking of a far off train, and feel the sand on the bottoms of your feet, merging into one another with each progression. It is an entire helpful bundle. It will be difficult to ever overlook Richmond Beach. It is currently interwoven in my verse, adolescence, profound life, family life, sentimental recollections, and even the death of my dad, whose remains was spread there. Thus, at whatever point I visit Richmond Beach, these components rest in my brain and soul. There are different spots that mix my creative mind and supply me with wistful surges, however Richmond Beach is at the highest priority on my rundown.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.